Area of destination	Sex	Absolute value and percentage	period	Total
Total	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	873.6
Total	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	667.0
Total	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	522.1
Total	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	489.6
Total	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	431.7
Total	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	335.6
Total	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	299.8
Total	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
Total	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
Total	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
Total	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
Total	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
Total	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
Total	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
Total	Males	Absolute value	2005	439.0
Total	Males	Absolute value	2004	331.2
Total	Males	Absolute value	2003	257.5
Total	Males	Absolute value	2002	248.8
Total	Males	Absolute value	2001	228.7
Total	Males	Absolute value	2000	175.0
Total	Males	Absolute value	1999	149.4
Total	Males	Percentage	2005	50.3
Total	Males	Percentage	2004	49.7
Total	Males	Percentage	2003	49.3
Total	Males	Percentage	2002	50.8
Total	Males	Percentage	2001	53.0
Total	Males	Percentage	2000	52.1
Total	Males	Percentage	1999	49.8
Total	Females	Absolute value	2005	434.5
Total	Females	Absolute value	2004	335.7
Total	Females	Absolute value	2003	264.7
Total	Females	Absolute value	2002	240.8
Total	Females	Absolute value	2001	202.9
Total	Females	Absolute value	2000	160.6
Total	Females	Absolute value	1999	150.4
Total	Females	Percentage	2005	49.7
Total	Females	Percentage	2004	50.3
Total	Females	Percentage	2003	50.7
Total	Females	Percentage	2002	49.2
Total	Females	Percentage	2001	47.0
Total	Females	Percentage	2000	47.9
Total	Females	Percentage	1999	50.2
Northwest	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	86.7
Northwest	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	41.5
Northwest	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	30.0
Northwest	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	33.1
Northwest	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	29.5
Northwest	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	26.3
Northwest	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	20.9
Northwest	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
Northwest	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
Northwest	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
Northwest	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
Northwest	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
Northwest	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
Northwest	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
Northwest	Males	Absolute value	2005	50.6
Northwest	Males	Absolute value	2004	20.8
Northwest	Males	Absolute value	2003	13.3
Northwest	Males	Absolute value	2002	14.6
Northwest	Males	Absolute value	2001	16.4
Northwest	Males	Absolute value	2000	14.2
Northwest	Males	Absolute value	1999	10.0
Northwest	Males	Percentage	2005	58.3
Northwest	Males	Percentage	2004	50.0
Northwest	Males	Percentage	2003	44.4
Northwest	Males	Percentage	2002	44.1
Northwest	Males	Percentage	2001	55.7
Northwest	Males	Percentage	2000	54.1
Northwest	Males	Percentage	1999	47.7
Northwest	Females	Absolute value	2005	36.2
Northwest	Females	Absolute value	2004	20.8
Northwest	Females	Absolute value	2003	16.7
Northwest	Females	Absolute value	2002	18.5
Northwest	Females	Absolute value	2001	13.0
Northwest	Females	Absolute value	2000	12.1
Northwest	Females	Absolute value	1999	10.9
Northwest	Females	Percentage	2005	41.7
Northwest	Females	Percentage	2004	50.0
Northwest	Females	Percentage	2003	55.6
Northwest	Females	Percentage	2002	55.9
Northwest	Females	Percentage	2001	44.3
Northwest	Females	Percentage	2000	45.9
Northwest	Females	Percentage	1999	52.3
Northeast	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	75.0
Northeast	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	50.0
Northeast	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	44.3
Northeast	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	35.9
Northeast	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	32.7
Northeast	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	28.7
Northeast	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	30.5
Northeast	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
Northeast	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
Northeast	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
Northeast	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
Northeast	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
Northeast	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
Northeast	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
Northeast	Males	Absolute value	2005	31.7
Northeast	Males	Absolute value	2004	24.4
Northeast	Males	Absolute value	2003	21.7
Northeast	Males	Absolute value	2002	16.9
Northeast	Males	Absolute value	2001	18.5
Northeast	Males	Absolute value	2000	10.9
Northeast	Males	Absolute value	1999	12.7
Northeast	Males	Percentage	2005	42.3
Northeast	Males	Percentage	2004	48.9
Northeast	Males	Percentage	2003	48.9
Northeast	Males	Percentage	2002	47.1
Northeast	Males	Percentage	2001	56.6
Northeast	Males	Percentage	2000	38.0
Northeast	Males	Percentage	1999	41.7
Northeast	Females	Absolute value	2005	43.3
Northeast	Females	Absolute value	2004	25.5
Northeast	Females	Absolute value	2003	22.7
Northeast	Females	Absolute value	2002	19.0
Northeast	Females	Absolute value	2001	14.2
Northeast	Females	Absolute value	2000	17.8
Northeast	Females	Absolute value	1999	17.7
Northeast	Females	Percentage	2005	57.7
Northeast	Females	Percentage	2004	51.1
Northeast	Females	Percentage	2003	51.1
Northeast	Females	Percentage	2002	52.9
Northeast	Females	Percentage	2001	43.4
Northeast	Females	Percentage	2000	62.0
Northeast	Females	Percentage	1999	58.3
Madrid	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	103.9
Madrid	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	62.7
Madrid	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	57.8
Madrid	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	33.9
Madrid	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	86.7
Madrid	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	31.9
Madrid	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	43.4
Madrid	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
Madrid	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
Madrid	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
Madrid	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
Madrid	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
Madrid	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
Madrid	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
Madrid	Males	Absolute value	2005	51.9
Madrid	Males	Absolute value	2004	36.2
Madrid	Males	Absolute value	2003	29.6
Madrid	Males	Absolute value	2002	18.1
Madrid	Males	Absolute value	2001	43.6
Madrid	Males	Absolute value	2000	16.2
Madrid	Males	Absolute value	1999	26.5
Madrid	Males	Percentage	2005	50.0
Madrid	Males	Percentage	2004	57.8
Madrid	Males	Percentage	2003	51.1
Madrid	Males	Percentage	2002	53.4
Madrid	Males	Percentage	2001	50.3
Madrid	Males	Percentage	2000	50.9
Madrid	Males	Percentage	1999	60.9
Madrid	Females	Absolute value	2005	52.0
Madrid	Females	Absolute value	2004	26.5
Madrid	Females	Absolute value	2003	28.2
Madrid	Females	Absolute value	2002	15.8
Madrid	Females	Absolute value	2001	43.1
Madrid	Females	Absolute value	2000	15.7
Madrid	Females	Absolute value	1999	17.0
Madrid	Females	Percentage	2005	50.0
Madrid	Females	Percentage	2004	42.2
Madrid	Females	Percentage	2003	48.9
Madrid	Females	Percentage	2002	46.6
Madrid	Females	Percentage	2001	49.7
Madrid	Females	Percentage	2000	49.1
Madrid	Females	Percentage	1999	39.1
Central	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	114.8
Central	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	92.0
Central	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	69.7
Central	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	62.0
Central	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	45.0
Central	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	49.1
Central	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	57.3
Central	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
Central	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
Central	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
Central	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
Central	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
Central	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
Central	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
Central	Males	Absolute value	2005	55.9
Central	Males	Absolute value	2004	46.7
Central	Males	Absolute value	2003	35.7
Central	Males	Absolute value	2002	33.6
Central	Males	Absolute value	2001	24.3
Central	Males	Absolute value	2000	27.1
Central	Males	Absolute value	1999	28.9
Central	Males	Percentage	2005	48.7
Central	Males	Percentage	2004	50.7
Central	Males	Percentage	2003	51.3
Central	Males	Percentage	2002	54.2
Central	Males	Percentage	2001	54.1
Central	Males	Percentage	2000	55.1
Central	Males	Percentage	1999	50.5
Central	Females	Absolute value	2005	58.9
Central	Females	Absolute value	2004	45.3
Central	Females	Absolute value	2003	34.0
Central	Females	Absolute value	2002	28.4
Central	Females	Absolute value	2001	20.7
Central	Females	Absolute value	2000	22.0
Central	Females	Absolute value	1999	28.4
Central	Females	Percentage	2005	51.3
Central	Females	Percentage	2004	49.3
Central	Females	Percentage	2003	48.7
Central	Females	Percentage	2002	45.8
Central	Females	Percentage	2001	45.9
Central	Females	Percentage	2000	44.9
Central	Females	Percentage	1999	49.5
East	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	283.5
East	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	267.0
East	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	198.7
East	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	202.8
East	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	152.1
East	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	107.1
East	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	88.8
East	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
East	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
East	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
East	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
East	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
East	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
East	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
East	Males	Absolute value	2005	146.0
East	Males	Absolute value	2004	128.3
East	Males	Absolute value	2003	102.3
East	Males	Absolute value	2002	108.2
East	Males	Absolute value	2001	73.9
East	Males	Absolute value	2000	58.1
East	Males	Absolute value	1999	40.6
East	Males	Percentage	2005	51.5
East	Males	Percentage	2004	48.0
East	Males	Percentage	2003	51.5
East	Males	Percentage	2002	53.3
East	Males	Percentage	2001	48.6
East	Males	Percentage	2000	54.2
East	Males	Percentage	1999	45.7
East	Females	Absolute value	2005	137.4
East	Females	Absolute value	2004	138.7
East	Females	Absolute value	2003	96.4
East	Females	Absolute value	2002	94.6
East	Females	Absolute value	2001	78.2
East	Females	Absolute value	2000	49.0
East	Females	Absolute value	1999	48.2
East	Females	Percentage	2005	48.5
East	Females	Percentage	2004	52.0
East	Females	Percentage	2003	48.5
East	Females	Percentage	2002	46.7
East	Females	Percentage	2001	51.4
East	Females	Percentage	2000	45.8
East	Females	Percentage	1999	54.3
South	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	163.5
South	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	128.3
South	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	68.5
South	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	85.8
South	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	56.4
South	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	70.3
South	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	36.8
South	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
South	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
South	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
South	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
South	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
South	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
South	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
South	Males	Absolute value	2005	81.3
South	Males	Absolute value	2004	61.8
South	Males	Absolute value	2003	30.8
South	Males	Absolute value	2002	42.6
South	Males	Absolute value	2001	35.4
South	Males	Absolute value	2000	37.2
South	Males	Absolute value	1999	19.1
South	Males	Percentage	2005	49.7
South	Males	Percentage	2004	48.2
South	Males	Percentage	2003	45.0
South	Males	Percentage	2002	49.7
South	Males	Percentage	2001	62.7
South	Males	Percentage	2000	53.0
South	Males	Percentage	1999	51.8
South	Females	Absolute value	2005	82.2
South	Females	Absolute value	2004	66.5
South	Females	Absolute value	2003	37.7
South	Females	Absolute value	2002	43.2
South	Females	Absolute value	2001	21.0
South	Females	Absolute value	2000	33.0
South	Females	Absolute value	1999	17.7
South	Females	Percentage	2005	50.3
South	Females	Percentage	2004	51.8
South	Females	Percentage	2003	55.0
South	Females	Percentage	2002	50.3
South	Females	Percentage	2001	37.3
South	Females	Percentage	2000	47.0
South	Females	Percentage	1999	48.2
Canarias	Both genders	Absolute value	2005	46.1
Canarias	Both genders	Absolute value	2004	25.5
Canarias	Both genders	Absolute value	2003	53.1
Canarias	Both genders	Absolute value	2002	36.1
Canarias	Both genders	Absolute value	2001	29.4
Canarias	Both genders	Absolute value	2000	22.2
Canarias	Both genders	Absolute value	1999	22.1
Canarias	Both genders	Percentage	2005	100.0
Canarias	Both genders	Percentage	2004	100.0
Canarias	Both genders	Percentage	2003	100.0
Canarias	Both genders	Percentage	2002	100.0
Canarias	Both genders	Percentage	2001	100.0
Canarias	Both genders	Percentage	2000	100.0
Canarias	Both genders	Percentage	1999	100.0
Canarias	Males	Absolute value	2005	21.6
Canarias	Males	Absolute value	2004	13.1
Canarias	Males	Absolute value	2003	24.0
Canarias	Males	Absolute value	2002	14.8
Canarias	Males	Absolute value	2001	16.6
Canarias	Males	Absolute value	2000	11.2
Canarias	Males	Absolute value	1999	11.7
Canarias	Males	Percentage	2005	46.8
Canarias	Males	Percentage	2004	51.3
Canarias	Males	Percentage	2003	45.3
Canarias	Males	Percentage	2002	41.0
Canarias	Males	Percentage	2001	56.6
Canarias	Males	Percentage	2000	50.5
Canarias	Males	Percentage	1999	53.0
Canarias	Females	Absolute value	2005	24.5
Canarias	Females	Absolute value	2004	12.4
Canarias	Females	Absolute value	2003	29.1
Canarias	Females	Absolute value	2002	21.3
Canarias	Females	Absolute value	2001	12.7
Canarias	Females	Absolute value	2000	11.0
Canarias	Females	Absolute value	1999	10.4
Canarias	Females	Percentage	2005	53.2
Canarias	Females	Percentage	2004	48.7
Canarias	Females	Percentage	2003	54.7
Canarias	Females	Percentage	2002	59.0
Canarias	Females	Percentage	2001	43.4
Canarias	Females	Percentage	2000	49.5
Canarias	Females	Percentage	1999	47.0