Sex	Area of destination	Habitation of destination	Absolute value and percentage	period	Total
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2012	444.5
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2011	464.7
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2010	471.6
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2009	524.9
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2008	593.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2007	766.6
Both genders	Total	Total	Absolute value	2006	797.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	Total	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2012	76.8
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2011	136.6
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2010	98.6
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2009	104.9
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2008	118.4
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2007	160.1
Both genders	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2006	182.8
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2012	17.3
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2011	29.4
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2010	20.9
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2009	20.0
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2008	20.0
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2007	20.9
Both genders	Total	Rural	Percentage	2006	22.9
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2012	367.6
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2011	328.1
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2010	373.0
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2009	420.0
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2008	474.5
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2007	606.4
Both genders	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2006	614.3
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2012	82.7
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2011	70.6
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2010	79.1
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2009	80.0
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2008	80.0
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2007	79.1
Both genders	Total	Urban	Percentage	2006	77.1
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2012	51.3
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2011	41.2
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2010	44.1
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2009	55.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2008	49.4
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2007	60.4
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2006	56.5
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2012	12.3
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2011	7.2
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2010	11.0
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2009	20.1
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2008	8.4
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2007	5.1
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2006	19.0
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2012	24.1
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2011	17.4
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2010	25.0
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2009	36.5
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2008	17.0
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2007	8.4
Both genders	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2006	33.6
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2012	39.0
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2011	34.0
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2010	33.1
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2009	34.9
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2008	41.0
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2007	55.4
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2006	37.5
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2012	75.9
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2011	82.6
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2010	75.0
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2009	63.5
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2008	83.0
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2007	91.6
Both genders	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2006	66.4
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2012	43.7
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2011	43.7
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2010	35.5
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2009	44.2
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2008	49.2
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2007	63.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2006	72.3
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2012	8.2
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2011	9.4
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2010	11.2
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2009	9.9
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2008	18.1
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2007	13.5
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2006	24.9
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2012	18.8
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2011	21.4
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2010	31.4
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2009	22.3
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2008	36.8
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2007	21.5
Both genders	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2006	34.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2012	35.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2011	34.3
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2010	24.4
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2009	34.3
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2008	31.1
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2007	49.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2006	47.4
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2012	81.2
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2011	78.6
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2010	68.6
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2009	77.7
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2008	63.2
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2007	78.5
Both genders	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2006	65.5
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2012	75.4
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2011	72.4
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2010	61.9
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2009	49.5
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2008	108.2
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2007	87.3
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2006	97.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2012	..
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2011	12.6
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2010	2.0
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2009	.
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2008	4.9
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2007	.
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2006	2.2
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2012	..
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2011	17.4
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2010	3.2
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2009	.
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2008	4.5
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2007	.
Both genders	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2006	2.2
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2012	75.4
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2011	59.8
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2010	59.9
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2009	49.5
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2008	103.3
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2007	87.3
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2006	94.8
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2011	82.6
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2010	96.8
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2008	95.5
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2006	97.8
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2012	42.2
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2011	54.8
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2010	43.7
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2009	62.8
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2008	69.2
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2007	110.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Absolute value	2006	101.6
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	Central	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2012	20.8
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2011	22.3
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2010	14.3
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2009	29.0
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2008	35.5
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2007	43.0
Both genders	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2006	39.1
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2012	49.4
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2011	40.6
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2010	32.7
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2009	46.2
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2008	51.3
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2007	39.1
Both genders	Central	Rural	Percentage	2006	38.5
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2012	21.3
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2011	32.6
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2010	29.4
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2009	33.8
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2008	33.7
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2007	66.9
Both genders	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2006	62.4
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2012	50.6
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2011	59.4
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2010	67.3
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2009	53.8
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2008	48.7
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2007	60.9
Both genders	Central	Urban	Percentage	2006	61.5
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2012	129.8
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2011	147.2
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2010	156.2
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2009	200.3
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2008	183.9
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2007	273.7
Both genders	East	Total	Absolute value	2006	301.9
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	East	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2012	22.5
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2011	55.4
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2010	43.5
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2009	27.9
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2008	32.2
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2007	58.7
Both genders	East	Rural	Absolute value	2006	63.4
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2012	17.3
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2011	37.6
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2010	27.8
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2009	13.9
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2008	17.5
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2007	21.4
Both genders	East	Rural	Percentage	2006	21.0
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2012	107.3
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2011	91.8
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2010	112.7
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2009	172.4
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2008	151.7
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2007	215.1
Both genders	East	Urban	Absolute value	2006	238.5
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2012	82.7
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2011	62.4
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2010	72.2
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2009	86.1
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2008	82.5
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2007	78.6
Both genders	East	Urban	Percentage	2006	79.0
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2012	77.5
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2011	82.6
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2010	79.9
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2009	85.6
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2008	89.3
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2007	139.2
Both genders	South	Total	Absolute value	2006	127.9
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	South	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2012	10.0
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2011	26.9
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2010	13.1
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2009	16.2
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2008	15.4
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2007	36.9
Both genders	South	Rural	Absolute value	2006	23.6
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2012	12.9
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2011	32.6
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2010	16.4
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2009	18.9
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2008	17.2
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2007	26.5
Both genders	South	Rural	Percentage	2006	18.4
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2012	67.5
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2011	55.6
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2010	66.8
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2009	69.4
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2008	73.9
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2007	102.3
Both genders	South	Urban	Absolute value	2006	104.4
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2012	87.1
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2011	67.4
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2010	83.6
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2009	81.1
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2008	82.8
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2007	73.5
Both genders	South	Urban	Percentage	2006	81.6
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2012	24.6
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2011	22.8
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2010	50.2
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2009	27.5
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2008	43.7
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2007	33.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2006	39.8
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2012	3.0
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2011	2.8
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2010	3.5
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2009	1.9
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2008	3.9
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2007	2.9
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2006	10.6
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2012	12.0
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2011	12.4
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2010	6.9
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2009	6.8
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2008	8.9
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2007	8.8
Both genders	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2006	26.6
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2012	21.6
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2011	20.0
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2010	46.8
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2009	25.6
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2008	39.8
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2007	30.0
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2006	29.2
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2012	88.0
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2011	87.6
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2010	93.1
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2009	93.2
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2008	91.1
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2007	91.2
Both genders	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2006	73.4
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2012	219.8
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2011	213.9
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2010	232.8
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2009	265.9
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2008	286.1
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2007	376.9
Males	Total	Total	Absolute value	2006	376.8
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	Total	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2012	31.2
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2011	62.2
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2010	48.2
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2009	63.3
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2008	65.2
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2007	74.5
Males	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2006	81.5
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2012	14.2
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2011	29.1
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2010	20.7
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2009	23.8
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2008	22.8
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2007	19.8
Males	Total	Rural	Percentage	2006	21.6
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2012	188.6
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2011	151.7
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2010	184.7
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2009	202.5
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2008	220.9
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2007	302.4
Males	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2006	295.4
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2012	85.8
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2011	70.9
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2010	79.3
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2009	76.2
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2008	77.2
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2007	80.2
Males	Total	Urban	Percentage	2006	78.4
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2012	25.7
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2011	18.6
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2010	21.9
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2009	34.4
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2008	24.3
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2007	25.6
Males	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2006	31.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2012	4.8
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2011	2.6
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2010	5.8
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2009	14.6
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2008	4.7
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2007	2.0
Males	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2006	10.8
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2012	18.9
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2011	14.2
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2010	26.7
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2009	42.3
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2008	19.4
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2007	7.7
Males	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2006	34.8
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2012	20.8
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2011	16.0
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2010	16.0
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2009	19.9
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2008	19.6
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2007	23.6
Males	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2006	20.3
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2012	81.1
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2011	85.8
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2010	73.3
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2009	57.7
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2008	80.6
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2007	92.3
Males	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2006	65.2
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2012	18.1
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2011	21.2
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2010	17.1
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2009	20.9
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2008	25.6
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2007	28.9
Males	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2006	35.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2012	2.8
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2011	6.2
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2010	5.1
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2009	4.2
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2008	11.4
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2007	6.3
Males	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2006	11.3
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2012	15.4
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2011	29.2
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2010	30.0
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2009	20.3
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2008	44.4
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2007	21.9
Males	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2006	32.3
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2012	15.4
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2011	15.0
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2010	11.9
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2009	16.6
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2008	14.3
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2007	22.6
Males	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2006	23.7
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2012	84.6
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2011	70.8
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2010	70.0
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2009	79.7
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2008	55.6
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2007	78.1
Males	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2006	67.7
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2012	35.2
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2011	34.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2010	35.9
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2009	20.1
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2008	51.8
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2007	41.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2006	41.4
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2012	..
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2011	7.5
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2010	2.0
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2009	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2008	2.0
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2007	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2006	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2012	..
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2011	21.9
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2010	5.6
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2009	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2008	3.9
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2007	.
Males	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2006	.
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2012	35.2
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2011	26.5
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2010	33.9
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2009	20.1
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2008	49.8
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2007	41.0
Males	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2006	41.4
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2011	78.1
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2010	94.4
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2008	96.1
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2012	19.7
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2011	27.9
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2010	22.6
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2009	35.3
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2008	37.1
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2007	51.8
Males	Central	Total	Absolute value	2006	46.6
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	Central	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2012	9.3
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2011	9.4
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2010	6.2
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2009	17.7
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2008	18.2
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2007	20.2
Males	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2006	14.9
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2012	47.2
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2011	33.8
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2010	27.5
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2009	50.2
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2008	48.9
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2007	38.9
Males	Central	Rural	Percentage	2006	32.0
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2012	10.4
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2011	18.5
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2010	16.4
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2009	17.6
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2008	18.9
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2007	31.7
Males	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2006	31.7
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2012	52.8
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2011	66.2
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2010	72.5
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2009	49.8
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2008	51.1
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2007	61.1
Males	Central	Urban	Percentage	2006	68.0
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2012	69.8
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2011	62.0
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2010	69.1
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2009	97.6
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2008	83.0
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2007	151.9
Males	East	Total	Absolute value	2006	138.7
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	East	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2012	10.5
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2011	22.7
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2010	19.1
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2009	15.3
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2008	20.2
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2007	33.8
Males	East	Rural	Absolute value	2006	29.4
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2012	15.0
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2011	36.6
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2010	27.6
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2009	15.6
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2008	24.3
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2007	22.2
Males	East	Rural	Percentage	2006	21.2
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2012	59.3
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2011	39.3
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2010	50.1
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2009	82.3
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2008	62.8
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2007	118.2
Males	East	Urban	Absolute value	2006	109.4
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2012	85.0
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2011	63.4
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2010	72.4
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2009	84.4
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2008	75.7
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2007	77.8
Males	East	Urban	Percentage	2006	78.8
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2012	37.7
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2011	40.4
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2010	45.4
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2009	42.1
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2008	41.1
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2007	62.8
Males	South	Total	Absolute value	2006	67.9
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	South	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2012	3.8
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2011	12.0
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2010	9.0
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2009	10.0
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2008	5.8
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2007	9.9
Males	South	Rural	Absolute value	2006	10.6
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2012	10.1
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2011	29.8
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2010	19.9
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2009	23.8
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2008	14.2
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2007	15.8
Males	South	Rural	Percentage	2006	15.6
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2012	33.9
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2011	28.4
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2010	36.3
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2009	32.0
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2008	35.3
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2007	52.9
Males	South	Urban	Absolute value	2006	57.3
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2012	89.9
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2011	70.2
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2010	80.1
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2009	76.2
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2008	85.8
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2007	84.2
Males	South	Urban	Percentage	2006	84.4
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2012	13.6
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2011	9.9
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2010	20.9
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2009	15.6
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2008	23.2
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2007	14.9
Males	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2006	16.2
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Males	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2012	..
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2011	1.8
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2010	0.9
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2009	1.5
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2008	2.9
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2007	2.4
Males	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2006	4.5
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2012	..
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2011	17.8
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2010	4.2
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2009	9.8
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2008	12.5
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2007	16.2
Males	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2006	27.8
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2012	13.6
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2011	8.1
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2010	20.1
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2009	14.1
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2008	20.3
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2007	12.5
Males	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2006	11.7
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2012	100.0
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2011	82.2
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2010	95.8
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2009	90.2
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2008	87.5
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2007	83.8
Males	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2006	72.2
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2012	224.7
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2011	250.9
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2010	238.7
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2009	259.0
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2008	306.9
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2007	389.7
Females	Total	Total	Absolute value	2006	420.2
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	Total	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2012	45.6
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2011	74.4
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2010	50.4
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2009	41.6
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2008	53.3
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2007	85.6
Females	Total	Rural	Absolute value	2006	101.3
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2012	20.3
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2011	29.7
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2010	21.1
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2009	16.0
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2008	17.4
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2007	22.0
Females	Total	Rural	Percentage	2006	24.1
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2012	179.0
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2011	176.5
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2010	188.4
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2009	217.4
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2008	253.6
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2007	304.1
Females	Total	Urban	Absolute value	2006	318.9
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2012	79.7
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2011	70.3
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2010	78.9
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2009	84.0
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2008	82.6
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2007	78.0
Females	Total	Urban	Percentage	2006	75.9
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2012	25.6
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2011	22.6
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2010	22.2
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2009	20.5
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2008	25.1
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2007	34.9
Females	Northwest	Total	Absolute value	2006	25.5
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	Northwest	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2012	7.5
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2011	4.5
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2010	5.2
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2009	5.5
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2008	3.7
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2007	3.1
Females	Northwest	Rural	Absolute value	2006	8.2
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2012	29.2
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2011	20.1
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2010	23.2
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2009	26.7
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2008	14.7
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2007	8.9
Females	Northwest	Rural	Percentage	2006	32.2
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2012	18.1
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2011	18.0
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2010	17.1
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2009	15.0
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2008	21.4
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2007	31.8
Females	Northwest	Urban	Absolute value	2006	17.3
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2012	70.8
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2011	79.9
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2010	76.8
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2009	73.3
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2008	85.3
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2007	91.1
Females	Northwest	Urban	Percentage	2006	67.8
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2012	25.5
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2011	22.5
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2010	18.4
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2009	23.3
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2008	23.6
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2007	34.1
Females	Northeast	Total	Absolute value	2006	37.4
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	Northeast	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2012	5.4
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2011	3.2
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2010	6.0
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2009	5.6
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2008	6.7
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2007	7.2
Females	Northeast	Rural	Absolute value	2006	13.6
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2012	21.2
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2011	14.1
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2010	32.7
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2009	24.2
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2008	28.5
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2007	21.1
Females	Northeast	Rural	Percentage	2006	36.5
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2012	20.1
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2011	19.4
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2010	12.4
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2009	17.7
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2008	16.8
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2007	26.9
Females	Northeast	Urban	Absolute value	2006	23.7
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2012	78.8
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2011	85.9
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2010	67.3
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2009	75.8
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2008	71.5
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2007	78.9
Females	Northeast	Urban	Percentage	2006	63.5
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2012	40.3
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2011	38.4
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2010	26.1
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2009	29.3
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2008	56.4
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2007	46.3
Females	Madrid	Total	Absolute value	2006	55.6
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	Madrid	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2012	..
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2011	5.1
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2010	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2009	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2008	2.9
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2007	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Absolute value	2006	2.2
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2012	..
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2011	13.4
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2010	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2009	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2008	5.1
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2007	.
Females	Madrid	Rural	Percentage	2006	3.9
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2012	40.3
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2011	33.3
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2010	26.1
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2009	29.3
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2008	53.5
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2007	46.3
Females	Madrid	Urban	Absolute value	2006	53.4
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2011	86.6
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2008	94.9
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	Madrid	Urban	Percentage	2006	96.1
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2012	22.5
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2011	27.0
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2010	21.1
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2009	27.6
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2008	32.1
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2007	58.1
Females	Central	Total	Absolute value	2006	54.9
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	Central	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2012	11.5
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2011	12.8
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2010	8.1
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2009	11.3
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2008	17.4
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2007	22.9
Females	Central	Rural	Absolute value	2006	24.2
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2012	51.4
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2011	47.6
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2010	38.3
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2009	41.0
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2008	54.1
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2007	39.4
Females	Central	Rural	Percentage	2006	44.1
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2012	10.9
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2011	14.1
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2010	13.0
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2009	16.3
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2008	14.8
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2007	35.2
Females	Central	Urban	Absolute value	2006	30.7
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2012	48.6
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2011	52.4
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2010	61.7
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2009	59.0
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2008	45.9
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2007	60.6
Females	Central	Urban	Percentage	2006	55.9
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2012	60.0
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2011	85.2
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2010	87.1
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2009	102.8
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2008	100.9
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2007	121.8
Females	East	Total	Absolute value	2006	163.1
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	East	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2012	12.0
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2011	32.7
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2010	24.4
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2009	12.6
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2008	12.0
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2007	24.9
Females	East	Rural	Absolute value	2006	34.0
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2012	20.0
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2011	38.4
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2010	28.0
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2009	12.3
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2008	11.9
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2007	20.5
Females	East	Rural	Percentage	2006	20.8
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2012	48.0
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2011	52.5
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2010	62.6
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2009	90.1
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2008	88.9
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2007	96.9
Females	East	Urban	Absolute value	2006	129.1
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2012	80.0
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2011	61.6
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2010	72.0
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2009	87.7
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2008	88.1
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2007	79.5
Females	East	Urban	Percentage	2006	79.2
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2012	39.8
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2011	42.2
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2010	34.5
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2009	43.6
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2008	48.2
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2007	76.4
Females	South	Total	Absolute value	2006	60.1
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	South	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2012	6.2
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2011	14.9
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2010	4.1
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2009	6.2
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2008	9.5
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2007	27.0
Females	South	Rural	Absolute value	2006	13.0
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2012	15.7
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2011	35.3
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2010	11.8
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2009	14.2
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2008	19.8
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2007	35.4
Females	South	Rural	Percentage	2006	21.6
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2012	33.6
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2011	27.3
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2010	30.4
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2009	37.4
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2008	38.6
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2007	49.4
Females	South	Urban	Absolute value	2006	47.1
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2012	84.3
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2011	64.7
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2010	88.2
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2009	85.8
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2008	80.2
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2007	64.6
Females	South	Urban	Percentage	2006	78.4
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2012	11.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2011	12.9
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2010	29.3
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2009	11.9
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2008	20.6
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2007	18.1
Females	Canarias	Total	Absolute value	2006	23.6
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2012	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2011	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2010	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2009	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2008	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2007	100.0
Females	Canarias	Total	Percentage	2006	100.0
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2012	3.0
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2011	1.1
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2010	2.6
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2009	0.4
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2008	1.0
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2007	0.5
Females	Canarias	Rural	Absolute value	2006	6.1
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2012	27.0
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2011	8.3
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2010	8.8
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2009	3.0
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2008	4.9
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2007	2.8
Females	Canarias	Rural	Percentage	2006	25.9
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2012	8.0
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2011	11.9
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2010	26.7
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2009	11.6
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2008	19.5
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2007	17.6
Females	Canarias	Urban	Absolute value	2006	17.5
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2012	73.0
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2011	91.7
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2010	91.2
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2009	97.0
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2008	95.1
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2007	97.2
Females	Canarias	Urban	Percentage	2006	74.1