Economically Active Population Survey
Chapter III. Provincial results
Active population by province and professional situation.
Units: thousands of persons

,total,self-employed: Total,self-employed: Employer,self-employed: Businessperson without wage earners, or independent worker,self-employed: Member of a cooperative,self-employed: Family Assistance,employees: Total,employees: Public sector,employees: Private sector,another situation,They have left their last job 3 or more years ago,Unemployed seeking first job,
Total,18,340.4,3,144.9,875.7,1,895.4,92.2,281.7,14,553.5,2,797.1,11,756.3,24.6,272.4,345.0,
Álava,143.9,21.3,7.7,11.0,2.0,0.5,119.7,21.9,97.8,0.1,1.1,1.8,
Albacete,148.8,33.2,9.1,19.4,1.2,3.5,112.0,29.7,82.3,0.2,1.7,1.7,
Alicante,686.8,120.4,40.7,57.5,4.6,17.5,547.2,76.3,470.8,1.3,7.7,10.2,
Almería,221.1,53.5,13.1,30.9,0.8,8.7,157.7,33.6,124.1,2.5,2.5,5.0,
Asturias,412.5,89.4,15.5,64.1,1.3,8.5,305.5,70.3,235.3,0.5,4.8,12.2,
Ávila,63.9,19.6,2.9,14.7,0.4,1.6,42.9,12.4,30.5,0.0,0.7,0.6,
Badajoz,277.1,54.7,16.5,31.0,2.3,4.8,209.4,63.6,145.8,0.6,4.5,7.8,
Balears (Illes),408.2,66.9,29.2,33.4,0.3,4.0,335.1,56.4,278.7,0.6,2.3,3.2,
Barcelona,2,283.2,357.0,77.4,245.8,8.0,25.8,1,858.6,212.5,1,646.1,1.1,35.4,31.1,
Burgos,155.6,31.6,8.4,18.1,0.3,4.8,121.1,21.3,99.8,0.4,0.8,1.8,
Cáceres,171.1,38.0,9.2,23.1,0.9,4.8,124.7,43.8,80.9,0.1,3.4,4.8,
Cádiz,484.7,48.6,15.1,28.2,1.8,3.5,396.3,100.4,295.8,0.2,17.2,22.4,
Cantabria,231.3,44.0,11.8,25.0,1.3,5.9,177.5,32.7,144.8,0.1,2.5,7.2,
Castellon de la Plana,219.3,45.0,15.3,26.4,0.2,3.2,171.7,22.6,149.1,0.1,0.8,1.6,
Ciudad Real,188.0,43.2,11.2,24.1,1.2,6.7,139.0,36.2,102.8,0.5,1.7,3.6,
Córdoba,302.3,47.9,13.1,27.5,2.7,4.5,237.3,47.9,189.4,0.5,7.0,9.6,
Coruña (A),496.4,112.1,24.9,73.0,0.7,13.4,358.1,76.1,282.0,0.6,10.4,15.2,
Cuenca,76.1,23.7,3.8,14.4,1.3,4.2,50.5,14.1,36.4,..,0.6,1.3,
Girona,300.6,51.8,23.1,26.0,0.6,2.1,244.3,30.2,214.1,0.1,1.9,2.5,
Granada,330.0,61.1,15.6,33.7,2.1,9.7,246.3,64.9,181.3,1.5,8.6,12.5,
Guadalajara,70.6,11.9,2.9,8.1,0.1,0.9,57.0,14.3,42.7,..,0.4,1.2,
Guipúzcoa,327.2,74.8,12.6,43.3,15.7,3.2,243.8,40.5,203.3,0.6,4.5,3.5,
Huelva,191.0,27.6,10.4,14.0,1.2,1.9,151.0,34.1,116.9,1.5,4.2,6.8,
Huesca,84.0,25.5,6.4,17.2,0.5,1.5,58.0,11.8,46.2,..,0.4,0.1,
Jaén,262.3,50.3,8.4,31.7,2.9,7.3,202.7,45.9,156.8,0.4,2.9,6.0,
León,188.0,50.9,10.5,34.5,1.8,4.1,129.9,30.9,99.0,..,3.3,3.8,
Lleida,167.2,47.4,11.6,31.0,0.1,4.6,116.4,26.7,89.7,..,2.0,1.4,
Lugo,156.2,57.7,8.9,33.9,0.8,14.2,92.7,22.0,70.7,0.2,2.3,3.3,
Madrid,2,496.0,273.5,93.4,161.1,4.5,14.5,2,157.1,439.0,1,718.1,4.7,25.2,35.5,
Málaga,556.9,85.9,28.2,47.9,0.5,9.3,443.0,80.8,362.2,0.3,10.2,17.5,
Murcia,510.6,84.1,31.0,43.7,1.1,8.4,409.1,81.4,327.7,0.8,6.1,10.5,
Navarra,251.5,53.8,12.8,35.8,2.5,2.6,194.6,37.8,156.8,0.1,1.4,1.6,
Ourense,147.5,38.9,11.7,22.8,0.9,3.5,103.1,28.8,74.4,0.1,2.6,2.7,
Palencia,69.3,17.1,2.9,12.6,0.3,1.3,49.7,12.1,37.7,0.3,0.8,1.3,
Palmas (Las),428.4,53.3,20.7,27.3,1.2,4.0,362.3,77.9,284.4,0.8,5.3,6.7,
Pontevedra,420.3,84.6,20.6,58.6,1.0,4.4,313.9,50.4,263.5,0.1,10.4,11.3,
Rioja (La),119.6,28.0,6.8,19.8,0.7,0.7,88.8,16.4,72.4,0.0,1.2,1.6,
Salamanca,152.5,31.1,7.2,19.9,0.4,3.6,113.5,34.4,79.2,0.1,2.5,5.3,
Santa Cruz de Tenerife,401.8,54.6,21.8,27.9,0.5,4.4,334.9,73.4,261.4,0.2,5.4,6.7,
Segovia,62.8,17.4,4.9,11.4,0.1,1.0,43.4,11.5,31.9,0.2,0.7,1.1,
Sevilla,762.1,96.6,24.8,56.7,4.4,10.7,628.8,138.2,490.6,0.7,18.1,17.9,
Soria,42.3,9.9,1.6,7.4,0.3,0.7,31.7,9.1,22.6,0.1,0.2,0.4,
Tarragona,313.7,55.7,18.3,31.1,0.3,5.8,253.5,38.6,214.9,0.2,3.0,1.2,
Teruel,52.8,17.0,4.0,11.9,0.3,0.7,34.9,9.3,25.6,0.0,0.4,0.5,
Toledo,231.4,51.2,13.7,31.8,1.2,4.6,172.8,36.3,136.5,0.0,3.8,3.5,
Valencia,1,044.7,165.9,58.5,94.0,4.2,9.1,848.0,130.1,717.9,1.2,16.9,12.8,
Valladolid,238.0,37.3,10.5,24.3,0.3,2.2,187.6,39.0,148.6,0.4,6.2,6.5,
Vizcaya,507.2,83.0,21.0,48.6,8.7,4.7,398.8,69.5,329.4,0.3,12.9,12.2,
Zamora,67.8,23.4,3.6,17.5,0.2,2.2,40.9,11.0,29.9,0.2,1.0,2.2,
Zaragoza,365.4,65.9,18.2,39.3,0.8,7.6,294.7,54.5,240.3,..,2.0,2.7,
Ceuta and Melilla,50.8,7.4,3.7,3.0,0.4,0.3,41.8,24.7,17.2,0.1,0.3,1.1,
Notes:
1) The estimates for Ceuta and Melilla are not published broken down  because the sample size in each one of them does not permit this
Source: National Statistics Institute