Economic activity	Characteristic of company	Size of the company	Total
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.85
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	9.10
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	13.79
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	19.66
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	12.91
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	19.58
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.08
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	10.21
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	12.06
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.30
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	4.61
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	5.29
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.75
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	6.62
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	10.69
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.95
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	3.95
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	7.90
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.36
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	3.14
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	6.32
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.76
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	5.34
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	7.73
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.77
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	7.34
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	8.75
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	20.54
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	22.15
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	20.56
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	41.75
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	41.09
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	41.74
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	22.71
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	17.91
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	22.64
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.34
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	13.51
TOTAL COMPANIES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	18.12
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	32.06
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	21.94
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	31.59
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.66
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	12.72
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	18.39
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	5.04
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	6.56
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	5.11
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	13.45
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	7.58
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	13.18
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	8.12
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	2.80
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	7.88
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	9.11
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	4.04
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	8.88
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	11.07
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	8.79
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	10.97
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	9.85
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	6.70
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	9.70
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	12.58
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	12.57
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	12.58
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	7.42
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	7.16
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	7.41
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	18.18
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	19.45
TOTAL COMPANIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	18.24
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	22.97
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	32.06
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	23.39
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	17.43
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	21.00
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	17.59
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	40.47
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	41.12
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	40.50
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	19.22
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	25.09
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	19.49
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	25.94
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	29.10
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	26.08
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	12.69
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	17.02
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	12.89
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	7.09
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	10.18
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	7.23
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	15.09
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	20.99
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	15.36
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	23.73
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	25.73
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	23.82
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	31.44
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	53.85
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	32.47
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	9.96
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	27.56
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	10.77
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	23.97
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	27.68
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	24.14
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	16.73
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	24.10
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	17.07
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	10.36
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	11.89
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	10.43
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	2.26
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	6.33
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	2.45
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.17
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.56
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	4.33
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	10.24
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	12.02
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	10.32
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	15.97
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	10.92
TOTAL COMPANIES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	15.74
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	21.88
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	11.48
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.52
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	34.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	17.83
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.41
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	12.50
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	4.56
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.66
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	18.75
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	4.92
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.41
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	9.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	8.42
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.73
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	9.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	5.79
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	2.59
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	2.54
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.06
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	8.89
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.56
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	12.50
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	7.65
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	23.67
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	21.88
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	23.64
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	44.49
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	18.75
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	44.02
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	23.67
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	34.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	23.86
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	14.05
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	13.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	28.76
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	25.64
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	28.58
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	16.88
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	15.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	16.80
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	5.19
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	4.89
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	12.25
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	11.55
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	1.14
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	1.08
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	6.40
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	6.04
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	22.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	19.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	22.42
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	9.05
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	8.54
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	14.01
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	13.22
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	7.72
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	7.28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	17.06
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	16.09
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	13.01
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	12.71
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	19.33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	18.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	38.18
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	19.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	37.10
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	16.04
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	29.49
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	16.80
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	24.61
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	10.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	23.79
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	11.66
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	10.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	11.58
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	9.93
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	33.33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	11.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	42.93
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	48.72
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	43.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	37.60
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	46.15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	38.08
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	29.40
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	44.87
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	30.28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	11.07
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	15.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	11.32
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	22.73
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	26.92
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	22.97
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	7.13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	15.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	7.60
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	8.86
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	34.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	10.32
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	1.73
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	2.07
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	6.98
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	7.02
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.19
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	56.41
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	7.16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	10.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	33.33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	11.91
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	21.57
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	2.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	21.38
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	29.52
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	5.86
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	29.28
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.95
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	12.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.71
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	2.35
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	6.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.53
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	5.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	12.46
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	9.17
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.64
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	6.57
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	2.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	8.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.85
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	9.75
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	25.77
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	16.92
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	25.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	43.91
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	35.05
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	43.82
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	33.08
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	22.78
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	32.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	25.33
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	16.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	24.88
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	37.87
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	28.65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	37.37
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.64
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	13.66
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	17.43
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	7.89
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	1.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	7.52
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	10.16
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	5.05
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	9.89
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	8.80
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	0.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	8.37
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	10.86
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	6.82
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	10.65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	16.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	12.11
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	16.04
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	14.40
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	4.63
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	13.87
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	9.89
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	16.93
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	10.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	8.14
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	5.84
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	8.02
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	17.78
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	13.32
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	17.54
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	25.65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	36.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	26.26
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	19.25
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	29.63
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	19.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	47.53
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	37.48
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	46.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	25.33
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	19.76
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	25.03
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	41.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	32.21
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	41.45
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	14.29
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	19.59
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	14.58
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	9.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	18.34
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	9.60
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	22.77
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	29.06
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	23.11
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	33.83
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	36.69
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	33.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	28.62
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	50.29
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	29.79
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	7.51
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	20.12
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	8.20
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	29.99
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	32.04
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	30.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	16.16
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	14.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	16.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	7.52
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	8.08
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	7.55
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	3.06
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	3.31
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	2.28
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	6.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	2.51
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	11.84
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	14.71
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	11.99
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	19.41
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	11.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	19.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	22.75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	17.39
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	22.73
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	32.26
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	32.21
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	16.40
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	8.70
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	16.37
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.22
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	4.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	7.21
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	11.22
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	8.41
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.14
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	17.39
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	8.18
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.65
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.72
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.26
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	9.22
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	22.29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	26.09
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	22.31
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	47.61
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	43.48
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	47.60
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	30.75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	30.71
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.93
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	17.65
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	39.36
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	17.07
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	38.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	16.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	16.44
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	3.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	3.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	15.81
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	15.57
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	9.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	6.10
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	9.58
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	8.75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	8.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	9.16
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	7.32
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	9.12
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	8.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	8.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	12.84
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	10.98
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	12.80
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	1.08
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	1.05
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	17.48
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	14.63
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	17.42
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	18.13
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	28.05
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	18.34
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	12.11
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	13.41
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	12.14
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	38.46
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	48.78
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	38.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	24.77
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	23.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	24.73
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	31.28
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	18.29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	31.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	12.89
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	15.85
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	12.96
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	8.45
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	13.41
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	8.55
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	13.25
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	30.49
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	13.62
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	13.79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	23.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	13.99
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	25.85
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	43.90
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	26.24
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	5.50
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	14.63
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	5.70
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	23.83
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	25.61
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	23.87
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	10.56
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	28.05
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	10.94
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	4.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	4.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	0.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	0.34
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.95
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	4.84
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	6.93
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.32
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	6.94
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	21.53
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	34.15
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	21.81
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	19.20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	18.90
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	27.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	27.43
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	17.26
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.61
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	5.52
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.57
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	9.43
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.66
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	7.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	6.10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.47
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	8.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.79
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	9.65
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	25.06
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	19.76
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	24.97
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	42.01
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	63.08
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	42.37
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	30.10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	8.55
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	29.73
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	23.52
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	17.92
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	23.39
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	33.39
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	26.21
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	33.22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	28.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	3.83
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	27.96
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	7.73
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	5.14
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	7.67
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	17.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	3.83
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	16.71
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	9.08
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	8.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	8.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	8.35
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	8.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	13.65
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	5.14
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	13.45
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	9.71
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	14.10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	9.81
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	10.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	12.80
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	10.63
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	6.60
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	3.83
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	6.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	14.55
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	19.16
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	14.66
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	23.39
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	44.13
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	23.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	18.05
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	12.80
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	17.93
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	39.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	57.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	39.44
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	26.96
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	49.95
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	27.50
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	35.93
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	35.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	35.93
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	12.86
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	12.19
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	12.85
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	7.11
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	16.63
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	7.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	21.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	14.72
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	20.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	22.08
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	28.28
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	22.22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	26.19
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	58.38
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	26.94
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	8.20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	27.51
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	8.65
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	29.78
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	33.95
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	29.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	14.70
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	17.92
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	14.78
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	8.23
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	14.72
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	8.38
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	0.79
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	3.22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	0.85
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	1.17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.05
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	1.31
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	13.56
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	13.49
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	13.56
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	22.71
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	16.17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	22.56
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.04
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	16.53
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	19.94
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	6.27
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	19.53
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	15.81
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	15.33
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	0.53
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	6.27
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	0.70
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.81
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	3.70
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.28
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	3.18
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.51
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	3.40
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.96
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	4.82
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.09
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	6.87
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	20.91
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	17.41
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	20.80
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	44.05
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	13.68
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	43.14
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	28.12
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	27.28
5. CHEMISTRY	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.67
5. CHEMISTRY	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	19.47
5. CHEMISTRY	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	18.76
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	35.16
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	18.60
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	33.26
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	14.72
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	11.26
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	14.32
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	3.66
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	3.14
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	3.60
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	3.80
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	2.18
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	3.62
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	8.43
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	2.21
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	7.72
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	3.24
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	5.49
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	3.50
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	7.42
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	5.72
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	7.23
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	7.85
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	7.83
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	7.84
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	16.54
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	11.38
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	15.95
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	7.56
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	8.92
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	7.72
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	19.75
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	12.84
5. CHEMISTRY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	18.96
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	28.28
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	45.62
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	30.26
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	23.02
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	28.35
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	23.63
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	40.84
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	39.89
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	40.73
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	17.06
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	26.31
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	18.12
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	26.94
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	38.90
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	28.31
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	17.53
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	17.91
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	17.57
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	13.48
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	9.27
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	12.99
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	37.91
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	36.00
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	37.69
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	37.92
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	29.71
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	36.98
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	41.81
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	65.61
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	44.53
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	13.03
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	49.16
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	17.17
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	19.48
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	19.02
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	19.43
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	29.04
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	19.11
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	27.90
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	18.83
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	5.91
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	17.35
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	6.74
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	12.85
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	7.44
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	9.55
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	8.19
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	9.39
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	10.28
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	20.61
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	11.46
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	11.95
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	15.56
5. CHEMISTRY	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	12.36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.04
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	32.95
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	17.24
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	27.51
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	32.95
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	27.58
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	11.08
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.89
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	3.84
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.53
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	10.40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.20
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	7.11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	5.29
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.71
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	8.60
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.07
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	8.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	9.06
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	25.57
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	17.50
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	25.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	45.84
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	24.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	45.56
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	32.22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	8.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	31.92
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	23.03
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	16.29
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	22.71
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	37.67
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	13.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	36.53
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.43
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	12.94
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	8.05
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	5.76
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	13.26
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	12.90
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	7.36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	7.15
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	4.56
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	5.23
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	4.60
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	12.49
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	12.17
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	7.18
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	6.84
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	11.75
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	30.43
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	12.63
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	10.69
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	10.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	10.68
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	19.66
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	19.31
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	19.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	28.81
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	38.15
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	29.25
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	21.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	27.69
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	21.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	40.63
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	41.28
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	40.66
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	16.88
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	16.35
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	33.01
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	11.06
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	31.98
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	13.14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	13.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	13.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	11.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	5.23
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	11.17
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	15.61
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	21.94
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	15.91
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	26.48
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	19.53
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	26.15
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	31.88
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	36.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	32.08
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	12.93
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	10.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	12.81
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	20.88
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	26.87
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	21.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	33.55
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	43.80
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	34.04
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	12.62
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	11.06
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	12.54
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	1.35
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	1.42
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	3.49
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	3.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	9.67
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	9.22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	22.49
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	21.57
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	19.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	11.91
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	18.94
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	25.94
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	18.72
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	25.87
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.38
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	5.43
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	17.27
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	2.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	2.81
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	10.90
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.73
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	9.64
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	6.78
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.05
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.52
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	5.11
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	10.48
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	24.03
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	27.23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	24.06
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	44.90
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	39.47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	44.85
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	22.70
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	24.47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	22.72
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	22.47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	18.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	22.26
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	31.33
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	15.45
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	30.59
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.89
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	17.88
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	18.85
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	2.62
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	15.45
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	3.22
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	12.74
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	4.26
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	12.34
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	7.42
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	4.26
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	7.27
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	6.82
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	6.50
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	7.07
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	12.40
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	7.32
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	8.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	7.65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	8.78
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	15.63
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	6.70
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	15.21
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	5.37
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	11.07
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	5.64
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	11.81
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	12.40
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	11.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	19.02
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	31.51
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	19.60
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	16.65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	10.69
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	16.37
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	39.12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	52.89
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	39.76
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	15.71
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	25.19
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	16.16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	37.02
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	28.23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	36.60
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	6.89
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	13.51
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	7.19
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	7.53
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	17.28
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	7.99
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	16.79
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	28.23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	17.33
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	21.88
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	28.96
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	22.21
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	26.80
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	55.10
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	28.12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	4.36
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	13.01
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	4.77
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	18.37
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	40.14
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	19.39
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	11.62
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	14.35
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	11.75
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	8.25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	8.75
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	8.27
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	2.76
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	9.25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	3.06
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	6.25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	16.06
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	6.71
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	9.87
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	6.09
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	9.69
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	21.93
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	14.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	21.60
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	23.05
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	22.66
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	36.50
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	19.78
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	36.22
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	15.65
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	15.39
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.60
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	11.41
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.78
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	12.57
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.74
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	13.51
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.69
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	7.56
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.11
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.99
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.94
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	6.82
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	28.56
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	13.69
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	28.31
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	40.71
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	29.28
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	40.51
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	37.44
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	36.81
8. METALLURGY	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.93
8. METALLURGY	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	10.02
8. METALLURGY	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	17.60
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	44.75
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	34.93
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	43.29
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	26.65
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	5.01
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	23.43
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	5.46
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	4.65
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	28.10
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	2.34
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	24.27
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	7.52
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	6.40
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	6.69
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	2.67
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	6.09
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	11.07
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	5.01
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	10.16
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	5.93
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	2.67
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	5.44
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	11.89
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	2.67
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	10.52
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	12.31
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	10.41
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	12.03
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	23.52
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	18.74
8. METALLURGY	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	22.81
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	26.12
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	35.78
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	27.56
8. METALLURGY	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	19.86
8. METALLURGY	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	24.66
8. METALLURGY	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	20.58
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	41.31
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	44.50
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	41.79
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	17.10
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	28.95
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	18.86
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	33.18
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	40.93
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	34.33
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	12.25
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	34.22
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	15.52
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	15.20
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	26.15
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	16.83
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	30.85
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	44.96
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	32.95
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	34.37
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	37.02
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	34.76
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	42.72
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	62.01
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	45.59
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	12.00
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	34.22
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	15.31
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	26.79
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	24.20
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	26.40
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	19.64
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	21.67
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	19.94
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	7.21
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	10.02
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	7.63
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.73
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.68
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	5.17
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	3.43
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	16.59
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	5.39
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	5.62
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	5.33
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	5.58
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	16.38
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	13.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	20.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	15.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	20.67
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	25.93
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	15.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	25.89
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	16.22
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	15.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	16.22
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.35
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	6.20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	6.35
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.12
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	13.08
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	6.20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	7.68
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.21
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	7.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.42
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.67
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	8.64
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	26.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	21.90
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	26.60
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	43.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	45.06
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	43.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	27.31
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	20.25
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	27.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	22.72
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	21.24
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	22.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	39.11
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	31.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	38.96
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	21.41
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	20.22
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	21.38
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	8.68
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	5.06
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	8.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	20.53
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	13.53
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	20.39
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	9.93
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	5.06
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	9.83
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	10.23
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	7.88
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	10.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	11.92
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	5.65
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	11.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	4.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	4.46
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	4.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	10.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	21.83
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	11.02
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	10.47
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	2.23
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	10.30
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	14.76
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	23.64
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	14.95
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	21.19
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	17.99
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	21.12
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	20.59
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	21.40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	20.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	41.86
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	43.24
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	41.89
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	26.10
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	37.59
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	26.34
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	36.03
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	48.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	36.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	17.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	32.53
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	18.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	7.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	2.82
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	7.08
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	20.27
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	31.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	20.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	27.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	39.20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	28.03
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	31.86
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	46.68
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	32.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	5.40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	10.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	5.51
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	21.49
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	29.71
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	21.66
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	22.86
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	36.57
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	23.15
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	8.47
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	15.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	8.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	3.98
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	11.72
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	4.14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	6.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	5.65
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	6.91
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	5.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	4.46
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	5.27
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	9.50
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	9.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	9.50
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	15.16
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	8.37
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	15.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	21.57
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	20.80
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	21.56
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	6.14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	10.99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.15
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	12.00
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	4.28
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	7.80
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	9.89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.35
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	5.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	6.34
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.67
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	1.68
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	3.64
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	7.58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.71
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.55
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	13.41
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	6.66
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	21.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	32.12
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	22.03
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	39.42
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	35.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	39.36
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	24.13
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	23.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	24.11
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	21.79
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	16.01
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	21.40
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	36.94
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	23.12
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	35.99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	20.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	12.91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	20.32
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	4.58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	5.31
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	4.63
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	17.65
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	8.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	17.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	8.20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	3.00
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	7.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	10.46
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	5.17
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	10.10
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	9.25
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	4.41
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	8.92
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	13.45
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	3.28
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	12.75
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	19.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	14.91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	19.58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	12.02
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	10.57
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	11.92
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	27.55
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	23.45
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	27.27
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	29.97
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	44.95
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	30.99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	19.27
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	30.47
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	20.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	40.42
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	47.89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	40.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	19.13
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	32.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	20.01
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	27.32
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	38.06
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	28.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	14.52
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	25.94
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	15.30
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	9.81
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	15.41
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	10.20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	15.63
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	21.74
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	16.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	32.40
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	28.82
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	32.15
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	38.22
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	55.20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	39.38
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	7.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	42.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	9.46
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	23.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	18.64
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	23.51
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	26.37
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	40.19
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	27.31
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	12.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	11.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	12.73
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	3.01
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	6.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	3.26
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.83
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.98
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	5.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	8.82
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	10.12
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	8.91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	18.72
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	13.51
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	18.36
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	21.82
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	21.80
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	29.73
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	29.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	16.01
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	15.99
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.48
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	8.47
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	14.94
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	14.93
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.43
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	9.42
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.13
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	10.12
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.87
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.86
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.49
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	10.48
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	22.58
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	22.56
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	40.73
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	40.69
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	32.20
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	32.16
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	26.78
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	18.23
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	26.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	43.46
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	13.24
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	42.91
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	29.03
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	22.93
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	28.92
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	7.22
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	13.24
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	7.33
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	22.69
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	19.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	22.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	15.49
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	5.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	15.29
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	14.30
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	18.23
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	14.37
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	11.75
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	11.62
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	10.10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	10.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	14.45
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	8.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	14.34
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	8.72
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	9.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	8.73
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	15.95
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	13.24
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	15.90
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	35.76
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	48.85
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	36.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	22.90
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	40.61
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	23.22
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	45.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	49.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	45.61
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	22.16
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	27.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	22.26
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	30.29
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	22.08
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	30.14
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	20.81
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	20.43
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	4.18
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	5.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	4.19
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	17.46
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	13.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	17.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	31.64
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	27.07
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	31.56
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	37.56
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	48.29
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	37.76
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	7.44
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	17.08
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	7.61
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	15.40
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	27.92
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	15.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	13.53
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	27.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	13.79
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	10.68
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	10.57
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	1.26
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	7.69
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	1.38
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	12.68
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	4.78
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	13.55
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	13.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	33.83
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	17.08
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	33.53
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	21.13
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	25.96
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	4.83
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	9.67
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	20.23
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	15.40
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	10.56
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.79
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	10.56
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	27.90
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	69.23
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	16.29
12. RECYCLING	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	21.35
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	42.75
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	19.69
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	7.27
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	3.64
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	0.00
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	0.00
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	33.93
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	25.03
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	21.35
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	14.12
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	48.01
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	19.64
12. RECYCLING	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	24.77
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	76.68
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	33.93
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	39.06
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	26.70
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	0.00
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	57.04
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	53.40
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	28.67
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	10.65
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	21.61
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	23.11
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	42.75
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	3.64
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	17.76
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	23.32
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	10.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	1.97
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	1.85
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.95
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	3.71
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.20
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	3.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	2.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	2.19
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	1.11
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	1.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	1.11
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	1.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	1.11
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	1.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.47
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	8.87
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	11.31
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.83
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	10.17
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	19.87
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	23.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	20.12
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	31.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	57.26
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	33.26
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	13.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	13.07
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.95
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	6.91
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	8.56
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	28.63
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	13.47
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	19.35
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	18.78
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	10.03
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	9.37
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	2.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	13.03
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	4.84
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	6.91
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	1.31
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	1.30
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	1.06
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	11.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	22.80
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	13.51
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	1.62
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	2.54
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	11.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	13.43
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	11.73
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	12.31
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	4.15
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	10.76
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	16.98
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	26.85
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	18.85
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	9.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	9.10
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	21.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	17.05
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	27.24
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	58.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	33.13
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	20.58
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	19.94
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	20.46
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	28.03
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	24.88
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	27.43
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	11.76
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	4.15
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	10.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	11.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	10.68
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	18.29
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	15.20
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	17.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	23.22
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	48.27
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	27.97
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	21.37
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	64.07
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	29.47
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	3.91
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	21.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	7.21
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	22.46
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	32.77
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	24.41
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	2.61
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	18.66
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	5.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	2.61
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	25.57
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	6.96
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.23
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	31.10
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	9.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	5.20
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	26.95
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	9.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	2.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	21.72
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	6.48
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	1.30
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	2.29
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.32
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	8.10
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	13.29
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.72
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	6.03
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	18.64
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.07
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	4.64
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	13.02
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.64
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	8.10
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	6.65
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.33
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	5.54
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	13.29
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.25
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	4.64
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	11.22
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.08
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	4.87
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	9.06
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.33
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	5.54
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	8.32
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	9.16
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	6.96
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	9.14
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	17.34
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	23.83
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	17.38
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	42.56
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	50.62
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	42.61
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	19.94
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	11.70
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	19.89
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.13
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	9.07
14. CONSTRUCTION	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	10.10
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	28.38
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	18.75
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	28.15
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.65
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	22.07
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	8.98
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	4.15
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	12.49
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	4.35
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	8.99
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	13.56
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	9.10
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	12.48
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	1.46
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	12.21
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	15.21
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	14.84
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	16.64
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	5.58
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	16.38
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	5.42
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	20.09
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	5.77
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	7.08
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	9.07
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	7.12
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	6.29
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	4.00
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	6.23
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	18.90
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	13.58
14. CONSTRUCTION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	18.77
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	9.99
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	20.39
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	10.24
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	12.64
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	15.60
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	12.71
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	27.11
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	17.58
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	26.88
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	16.02
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	9.58
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	15.86
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	8.89
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	6.93
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	8.84
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	4.32
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	11.44
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	4.49
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	2.22
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	2.16
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	7.86
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	14.14
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	8.01
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	16.22
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	24.11
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	16.41
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16.59
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	39.55
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	17.14
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	3.50
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	25.97
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	4.04
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	23.48
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	17.75
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	23.34
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	8.84
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	14.65
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	8.98
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	6.35
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	12.39
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	6.49
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	1.42
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	5.46
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	1.51
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	2.89
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	16.12
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	3.21
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	5.36
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	9.85
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	5.47
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	5.29
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	1.46
14. CONSTRUCTION	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	5.20
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.39
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	8.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	12.35
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	17.74
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	11.92
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	17.68
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.80
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	11.78
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	8.83
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.23
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	3.46
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	5.22
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	6.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	10.79
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.78
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	4.50
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	6.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.78
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	3.32
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	5.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.75
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	1.82
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	7.68
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.22
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	3.77
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	7.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	22.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	22.27
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	22.87
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	41.45
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	37.11
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	41.41
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	21.57
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	17.31
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	21.52
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.54
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	4.71
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	12.36
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	22.12
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	15.42
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	21.96
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	14.45
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	8.47
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	14.31
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	3.66
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	12.90
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	3.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	12.39
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	6.47
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	12.25
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	5.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	1.12
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	5.08
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	7.09
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	1.12
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	6.95
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	8.06
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	13.09
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	8.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	12.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	7.45
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	12.75
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	10.59
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	3.91
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	10.43
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	5.63
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	9.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	5.70
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	13.85
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	18.02
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	13.94
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	19.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	11.99
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	19.01
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	14.41
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	10.05
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	14.30
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	39.63
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	36.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	39.54
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	10.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	15.95
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	10.96
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	16.93
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	19.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	17.00
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	12.67
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	16.68
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	12.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	6.01
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	4.52
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	5.98
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	8.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	19.53
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	8.30
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	20.70
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	23.06
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	20.75
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	28.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	54.20
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	29.43
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	14.34
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	32.63
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	14.77
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	24.96
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	31.37
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	25.11
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	11.77
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	15.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	11.85
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	12.37
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	9.00
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	12.29
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	0.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	2.16
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	0.79
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	0.95
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	4.48
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	1.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	12.79
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	15.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	12.86
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	18.22
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	12.56
15. TRADE AND CATERING	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	18.09
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.36
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	12.22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	13.35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	22.20
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	21.68
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	22.19
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.62
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	11.64
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	12.61
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	4.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	5.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.25
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	4.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	8.21
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.78
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	4.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	4.78
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	2.91
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	2.54
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	2.90
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.68
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	2.54
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	4.66
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.81
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	10.70
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	19.27
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	30.11
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	19.38
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	39.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	29.16
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	39.43
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	22.80
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	15.87
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	22.73
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	16.03
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	4.67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	15.31
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	20.70
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	18.04
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	20.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	13.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	7.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	13.13
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	7.49
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	6.17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	7.41
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	14.55
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	9.59
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	14.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	5.77
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	5.10
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	5.73
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	3.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	3.42
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	3.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	11.45
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	10.23
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	11.37
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	8.69
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	3.38
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	8.35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	14.19
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	11.22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	14.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	6.60
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	4.28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	6.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	13.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	11.01
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	12.87
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	17.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	16.75
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	17.47
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	12.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	8.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	12.28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	38.07
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	44.88
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	38.50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	19.47
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	17.21
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	19.33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	17.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	21.81
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	18.20
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	14.17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	12.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	14.06
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	5.84
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	7.77
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	5.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	18.93
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	12.29
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	18.51
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	16.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	15.11
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	16.38
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	32.92
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	48.06
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	33.87
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	11.86
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	16.67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	12.16
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	28.27
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	31.28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	28.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	13.27
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	10.62
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	13.10
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	9.15
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	11.01
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	9.26
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	5.01
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	0.32
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	5.09
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	2.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	4.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	3.23
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	11.35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	3.75
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	2.25
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	1.67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	2.21
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.42
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	10.39
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.51
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	10.72
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	12.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	7.26
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.13
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	5.35
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.88
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	4.10
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.20
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	4.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.59
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	7.58
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.82
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	6.81
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	10.98
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	10.96
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	40.91
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	40.82
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	21.67
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	21.86
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	14.94
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	15.97
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	45.17
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	40.85
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	44.70
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.74
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	28.48
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	12.67
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	4.07
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	0.44
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	22.90
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	16.44
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	22.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	22.56
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	4.07
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	20.54
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	22.62
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	20.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	16.65
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	12.37
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	16.18
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	6.54
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	5.83
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	22.43
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	19.99
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	19.60
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	20.12
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	28.29
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	27.87
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	26.44
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	61.35
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	30.25
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	23.79
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	49.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	26.56
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	37.55
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	57.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	39.70
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	10.33
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	49.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	14.56
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	14.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	53.21
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	18.52
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	3.78
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	24.74
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	6.06
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	1.47
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	8.30
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	2.22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	2.66
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	4.64
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	28.48
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	7.24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	34.66
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	67.45
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	38.24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	22.68
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	41.01
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	24.68
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	23.09
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	51.18
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	26.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	17.12
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	38.65
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	19.47
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	12.31
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	20.34
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	13.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	1.47
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	1.31
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	5.06
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	4.50
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	7.34
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	12.37
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	7.89
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	6.76
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	12.37
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	7.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	2.79
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	4.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	2.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	13.78
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	5.86
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.74
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	4.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	5.68
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.53
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	4.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	3.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	4.64
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	4.38
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	2.61
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	2.46
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	1.96
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	1.85
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.87
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	11.73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	11.86
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	6.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	9.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	6.49
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	31.84
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	16.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	30.97
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	34.49
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	21.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	33.76
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	18.07
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	20.92
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	18.23
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.78
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	11.45
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	4.97
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	25.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	12.75
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	23.41
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	0.86
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	4.06
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	1.36
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	4.91
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	4.15
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	3.10
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	3.16
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	3.11
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	1.32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	1.12
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	4.46
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	3.77
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	13.01
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	8.09
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	12.25
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	7.63
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	3.95
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	7.06
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	18.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	5.88
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	16.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	5.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	1.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	5.16
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	26.64
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	21.82
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	25.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	43.84
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	36.40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	42.69
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	11.61
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	15.79
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	12.26
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	53.70
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	38.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	51.32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	24.52
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	33.66
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	25.94
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	19.27
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	40.73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	22.60
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	13.62
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	21.47
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	14.84
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	5.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	5.13
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	5.30
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	1.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	0.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	16.73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	14.58
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	16.40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	54.31
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	62.50
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	55.58
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	39.08
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	34.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	38.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	19.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	39.32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	22.91
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	12.74
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	25.20
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	14.68
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	19.69
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	26.98
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	20.82
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	1.10
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	8.09
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	2.19
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	1.10
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	5.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	1.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	10.06
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	10.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.50
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	12.18
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	12.48
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	10.32
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	12.74
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	10.41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	2.67
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	4.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	2.75
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.53
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	9.08
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	7.59
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	4.05
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	7.47
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.21
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	3.86
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	5.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.98
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	7.68
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	6.05
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	11.18
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	12.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	11.24
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	16.49
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	21.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	16.66
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	43.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	43.34
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	43.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	19.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	20.84
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	19.22
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	18.61
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	14.35
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	18.32
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	32.63
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	25.82
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	32.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	25.14
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	15.90
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	24.50
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	2.66
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	6.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	2.89
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	9.41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	11.40
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	9.55
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	3.73
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	5.37
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	3.85
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	9.33
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	3.05
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	8.89
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	7.97
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	8.52
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	8.01
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	10.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	12.98
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	10.93
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	11.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	19.71
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	12.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	8.34
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	5.13
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	8.12
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	22.89
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	29.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	23.36
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	26.43
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	25.88
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	26.39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	23.02
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	20.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	22.85
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	47.87
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	33.66
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	46.88
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	21.59
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	19.86
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	21.47
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	26.29
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	19.27
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	25.80
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	10.51
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	8.42
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	10.36
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	6.35
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	5.54
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	6.29
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	13.32
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	11.29
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	13.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	21.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	13.96
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	21.22
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	43.07
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	57.25
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	44.06
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	12.15
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	17.20
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	12.50
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	24.31
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	23.43
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	24.25
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	22.85
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	27.63
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	23.18
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	11.37
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	13.38
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	11.51
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	4.47
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	3.68
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	4.42
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	9.75
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	6.91
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	9.55
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	15.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	9.09
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	14.58
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	10.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	5.94
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	10.43
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.79
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	250 or more employees	10.41
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important	Total 2000	7.84
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	14.37
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	21.60
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	14.49
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	16.41
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	250 or more employees	18.32
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important	Total 2000	16.45
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.01
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	250 or more employees	3.57
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important	Total 2000	3.02
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Less than 250 employees	7.25
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	250 or more employees	5.96
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important	Total 2000	7.23
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Less than 250 employees	5.34
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	250 or more employees	1.96
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important	Total 2000	5.29
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Less than 250 employees	3.56
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	250 or more employees	2.38
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important	Total 2000	3.54
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Less than 250 employees	12.36
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	250 or more employees	8.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important	Total 2000	12.30
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Less than 250 employees	8.48
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	250 or more employees	7.92
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important	Total 2000	8.47
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Less than 250 employees	14.47
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	250 or more employees	20.66
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.	Total 2000	14.58
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Less than 250 employees	33.96
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	250 or more employees	43.35
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations	Total 2000	34.12
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Less than 250 employees	19.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	250 or more employees	20.07
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions	Total 2000	19.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Less than 250 employees	19.01
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	250 or more employees	13.51
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important	Total 2000	18.69
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Less than 250 employees	30.09
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	250 or more employees	21.64
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important	Total 2000	29.59
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Less than 250 employees	31.02
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	250 or more employees	20.93
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important	Total 2000	30.43
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Less than 250 employees	4.03
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	250 or more employees	15.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company	Total 2000	4.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Less than 250 employees	5.66
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	250 or more employees	5.28
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel	Total 2000	5.64
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Less than 250 employees	10.19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	250 or more employees	2.19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.	Total 2000	9.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Less than 250 employees	7.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	250 or more employees	6.54
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information	Total 2000	7.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Less than 250 employees	11.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	250 or more employees	17.51
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.	Total 2000	11.88
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Less than 250 employees	4.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	250 or more employees	5.62
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients	Total 2000	4.89
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Less than 250 employees	15.61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	250 or more employees	12.75
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.	Total 2000	15.44
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Less than 250 employees	4.60
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	250 or more employees	8.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented	Total 2000	4.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Less than 250 employees	21.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	250 or more employees	22.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems	Total 2000	21.90
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Less than 250 employees	30.37
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	250 or more employees	33.16
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services	Total 2000	30.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Less than 250 employees	17.05
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	250 or more employees	17.21
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota	Total 2000	17.06
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Less than 250 employees	43.87
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	250 or more employees	39.77
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services	Total 2000	43.63
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Less than 250 employees	19.45
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	250 or more employees	30.48
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production	Total 2000	20.09
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Less than 250 employees	20.61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	250 or more employees	31.62
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production	Total 2000	21.25
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Less than 250 employees	11.42
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	250 or more employees	8.43
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.)	Total 2000	11.24
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Less than 250 employees	7.83
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	250 or more employees	7.41
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production)	Total 2000	7.81
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Less than 250 employees	11.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	250 or more employees	20.64
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement	Total 2000	12.49
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Less than 250 employees	17.79
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	250 or more employees	26.34
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules	Total 2000	18.29
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Less than 250 employees	36.14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	250 or more employees	45.58
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance	Total 2000	36.69
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	18.26
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	21.21
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	18.44
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Less than 250 employees	20.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	250 or more employees	37.92
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info	Total 2000	21.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Less than 250 employees	18.93
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	250 or more employees	13.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information	Total 2000	18.63
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Less than 250 employees	14.42
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	250 or more employees	9.50
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.	Total 2000	14.13
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	7.12
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	12.61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	7.44
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	6.24
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	11.28
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	6.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Less than 250 employees	17.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	250 or more employees	21.95
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information	Total 2000	18.22
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Less than 250 employees	11.82
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	250 or more employees	16.16
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:	Total 2000	12.07