Economic activity	Method employed to protect innovations or inventions	Size of the company	Total
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	3,900
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	306
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	4,206
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	2,651
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	251
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	2,902
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	1,250
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	54
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	1,304
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	2.69
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	10.33
TOTAL COMPANIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	2.84
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	5,591
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	407
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	5,998
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	3,492
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	317
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	3,809
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	2,099
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	90
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	2,189
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	3.86
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	13.77
TOTAL COMPANIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	4.06
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	10,099
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	2,817
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	12,916
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	7,319
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	2,677
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	9,996
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	2,781
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	140
TOTAL COMPANIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	2,920
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	22,581
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	7,551
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	30,132
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	15,541
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	7,177
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	22,718
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	7,040
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	373
TOTAL COMPANIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	7,414
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	4,349
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	292
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	4,641
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	5,854
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	364
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	6,218
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	1,270
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	122
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	1,391
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	5,673
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	409
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	6,082
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	5,585
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	415
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	6,000
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	6,409
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	455
TOTAL COMPANIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	6,864
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.85
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	12.59
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	10.94
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	22
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	22
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	22
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.62
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	5.68
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	3.73
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13.11
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	24.31
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	13.72
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	18
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13.83
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	20.65
TOTAL COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	14.20
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	8
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	9
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	7
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	1.04
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	4.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	1.13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	9
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	11
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	8
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	3
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	1.10
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	8.45
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	1.32
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	20
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	5
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	5
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	29
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	110
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	139
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	110
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	133
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	5
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	21
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	10
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	9
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	12
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	14.74
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	17
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	18
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	26.55
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	23.55
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	40
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	12
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8.12
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	40.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	11.72
1.1 Extractive industries	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	8
1.1 Extractive industries	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	8
1.1 Extractive industries	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
1.1 Extractive industries	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	6
1.1 Extractive industries	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	2
1.1 Extractive industries	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	2
1.1 Extractive industries	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	1.05
1.1 Extractive industries	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	0.00
1.1 Extractive industries	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	1.03
1.1 Extractive industries	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	9
1.1 Extractive industries	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	9
1.1 Extractive industries	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
1.1 Extractive industries	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	6
1.1 Extractive industries	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
1.1 Extractive industries	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	3
1.1 Extractive industries	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	1.11
1.1 Extractive industries	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	0.00
1.1 Extractive industries	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	1.09
1.1 Extractive industries	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	20
1.1 Extractive industries	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	20
1.1 Extractive industries	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	15
1.1 Extractive industries	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	15
1.1 Extractive industries	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	5
1.1 Extractive industries	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	5
1.1 Extractive industries	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	29
1.1 Extractive industries	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	29
1.1 Extractive industries	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	23
1.1 Extractive industries	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	23
1.1 Extractive industries	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	6
1.1 Extractive industries	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	6
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	13
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	13
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	15
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	15
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	0
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	13
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	2
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	16
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	10
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	1
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	12
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	9
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	1
1.1 Extractive industries	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	11
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17.57
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	16.68
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	18
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	25.78
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	24.46
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	57
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	11
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8.59
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	57.14
1.1 Extractive industries	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	11.07
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	14.29
1.2 Petroleum industries	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	6.25
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	2
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	2
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	28.57
1.2 Petroleum industries	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	12.50
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	13
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	13
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	13
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	13
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	110
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	110
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	110
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	110
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	2
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	3
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	3
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	3
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	5
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	1
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	29
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	17
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	40.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	16.67
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	29
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	17
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	28.57
1.2 Petroleum industries	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	16.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	313
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	13
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	326
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	236
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	246
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	77
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	4
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	80
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	5.06
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	8.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	5.14
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	397
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	24
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	420
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	263
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	18
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	281
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	134
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	6
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	139
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	6.42
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	14.23
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	6.62
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	705
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	104
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	809
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	380
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	94
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	474
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	325
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	335
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	1,851
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	493
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2,343
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	1,393
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	471
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,864
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	458
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	22
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	479
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	382
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	23
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	405
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	861
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	37
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	897
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	5
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	70
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	594
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	41
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	635
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	411
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	39
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	449
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	444
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	44
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	488
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11.31
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	18.32
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	11.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	40
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	36
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	40
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	2.02
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	1.92
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.05
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	29.63
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	15.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	15
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	6
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	36.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	12.29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	160
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	169
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	105
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	7
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	112
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	55
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	57
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	2.31
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	14.06
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	2.42
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	277
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	13
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	290
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	203
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	212
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	4
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	4.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	20.31
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	4.15
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	312
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	37
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	349
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	233
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	28
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	261
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	690
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	286
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	976
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	456
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	267
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	723
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	234
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	19
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	253
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	228
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	237
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	692
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	16
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	708
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	78
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	2
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	80
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	538
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	19
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	557
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	548
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	20
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	568
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	457
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	16
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	473
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9.96
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	7.79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	9.89
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.12
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	2.60
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.20
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	35.06
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	17.27
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13.02
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	15.58
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	13.10
3.1 TEXTILES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	115
3.1 TEXTILES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	5
3.1 TEXTILES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	120
3.1 TEXTILES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	72
3.1 TEXTILES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	4
3.1 TEXTILES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	76
3.1 TEXTILES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	44
3.1 TEXTILES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
3.1 TEXTILES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	45
3.1 TEXTILES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	5.29
3.1 TEXTILES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	15.15
3.1 TEXTILES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	5.44
3.1 TEXTILES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	117
3.1 TEXTILES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	8
3.1 TEXTILES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	125
3.1 TEXTILES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	95
3.1 TEXTILES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	6
3.1 TEXTILES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	101
3.1 TEXTILES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	22
3.1 TEXTILES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
3.1 TEXTILES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	24
3.1 TEXTILES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	5.37
3.1 TEXTILES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	24.24
3.1 TEXTILES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	5.65
3.1 TEXTILES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	206
3.1 TEXTILES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	20
3.1 TEXTILES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	226
3.1 TEXTILES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	144
3.1 TEXTILES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	17
3.1 TEXTILES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	161
3.1 TEXTILES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	62
3.1 TEXTILES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	3
3.1 TEXTILES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	65
3.1 TEXTILES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	226
3.1 TEXTILES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	270
3.1 TEXTILES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	496
3.1 TEXTILES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	158
3.1 TEXTILES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	260
3.1 TEXTILES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	418
3.1 TEXTILES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	69
3.1 TEXTILES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	10
3.1 TEXTILES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	79
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	68
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	6
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	74
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	229
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	9
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	238
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	20
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	1
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	21
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	228
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	16
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	244
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	204
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	16
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	220
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	190
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	15
3.1 TEXTILES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	205
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5.31
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	8.70
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	5.47
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	22
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	19
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17.09
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	52.17
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	18.66
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	17
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	13
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	12.52
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	26.09
3.1 TEXTILES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	13.13
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	28
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	4
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	32
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	22
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	25
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	0.92
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	16.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	1.04
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	113
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	5
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	118
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	78
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	81
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	35
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	37
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	3.73
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	20.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	3.86
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	37
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	17
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	54
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	25
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	11
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	36
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	12
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	6
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	18
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	198
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	16
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	214
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	87
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	94
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	111
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	9
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	120
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	104
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	3
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	107
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	201
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	208
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	19
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	20
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	218
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	219
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	240
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	2
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	242
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	188
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	189
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19.80
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	7.14
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	19.37
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	23
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	43
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	24
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	7.14
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.24
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	25.65
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	24.77
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	12
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	12
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	20.15
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	19.47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	17
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	17
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	12
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	0.98
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	0.98
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	30
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	30
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	18
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	18
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	2.75
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	2.74
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	69
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	69
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	65
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	65
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	266
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	266
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	211
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	211
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	57
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	57
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	263
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	263
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	39
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	39
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	92
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	2
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	94
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	105
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	2
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	106
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	80
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	80
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4.48
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	4.46
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.46
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4.02
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	100.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	4.50
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	1
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	100
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	2
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4.32
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	4.28
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	309
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	16
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	325
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	187
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	13
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	200
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	123
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	3
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	126
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	5.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	13.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	5.49
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	365
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	387
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	210
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	227
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	155
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	5
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	160
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	6.27
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	19.41
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	6.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	675
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	77
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	752
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	407
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	64
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	471
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	268
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	13
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	281
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	1,645
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	237
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	1,882
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	758
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	178
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	935
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	887
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	59
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	946
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	269
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	286
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	332
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	23
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	355
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	135
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	9
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	144
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	342
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	359
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	323
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	12
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	335
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	381
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	14
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	395
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.36
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	4.82
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	14.92
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	18
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5.68
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	13.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	6.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.67
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	19.27
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	15.82
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	7
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16.50
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	7.23
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	16.12
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	97
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	4
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	101
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	68
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	71
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	29
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	30
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	4.27
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	9.27
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	4.36
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	128
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	4
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	132
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	67
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	70
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	61
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	62
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	5.64
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	9.27
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	5.71
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	109
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	8
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	117
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	70
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	6
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	76
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	39
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	2
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	41
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	186
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	13
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	199
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	98
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	10
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	108
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	88
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	91
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	43
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	4
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	47
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	61
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	66
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	5
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	1
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	6
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	128
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	131
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	135
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	2
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	137
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	128
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	131
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9.09
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	16.67
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	9.26
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	17
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	7
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	1.78
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	1.74
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24.20
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	16.67
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	24.03
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	0
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	8
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.71
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
4.1 WOOD AND CORK	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	15.36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	115
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	125
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	24
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	8
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	32
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	91
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	93
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	13.55
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	32.26
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	14.21
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	79
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	12
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	91
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	27
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	9
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	52
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	3
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	55
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	9.32
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	38.71
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	10.35
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	272
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	49
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	321
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	52
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	38
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	90
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	220
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	11
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	231
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	893
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	98
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	991
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	170
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	43
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	213
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	723
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	55
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	778
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	105
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	115
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	114
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	8
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	122
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	54
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	64
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	9
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	45
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	46
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	38.96
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	5.26
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	36.15
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	39
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	11
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	37
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17.71
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	31.58
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	18.87
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	16
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	1
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	1.41
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	10.53
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	2.17
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	98
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	2
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	100
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	95
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	97
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	3
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	3.62
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	4.86
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	3.64
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	158
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	6
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	164
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	116
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	5
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	121
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	42
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	43
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	5.85
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	15.51
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	5.99
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	295
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	20
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	315
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	286
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	20
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	306
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	566
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	126
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	692
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	490
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	125
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	615
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	76
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	77
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	121
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	3
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	124
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	158
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	10
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	168
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	130
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	8
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	138
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	160
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	4
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	164
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	152
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	153
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	217
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	218
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8.65
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	8.37
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	26
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	19
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.19
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	34.89
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	10.99
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.24
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	6.06
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	10.10
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	6
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	23.36
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	6.06
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	22.79
5. CHEMISTRY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	152
5. CHEMISTRY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	31
5. CHEMISTRY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	183
5. CHEMISTRY	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	122
5. CHEMISTRY	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	31
5. CHEMISTRY	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	153
5. CHEMISTRY	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	30
5. CHEMISTRY	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
5. CHEMISTRY	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	30
5. CHEMISTRY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	10.51
5. CHEMISTRY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	24.45
5. CHEMISTRY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	11.63
5. CHEMISTRY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	241
5. CHEMISTRY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	48
5. CHEMISTRY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	289
5. CHEMISTRY	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	165
5. CHEMISTRY	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	45
5. CHEMISTRY	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	210
5. CHEMISTRY	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	75
5. CHEMISTRY	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	3
5. CHEMISTRY	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	79
5. CHEMISTRY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	16.61
5. CHEMISTRY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	38.22
5. CHEMISTRY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	18.35
5. CHEMISTRY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	677
5. CHEMISTRY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	535
5. CHEMISTRY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	1,212
5. CHEMISTRY	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	580
5. CHEMISTRY	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	535
5. CHEMISTRY	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,116
5. CHEMISTRY	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	96
5. CHEMISTRY	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
5. CHEMISTRY	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	96
5. CHEMISTRY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	1,789
5. CHEMISTRY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	711
5. CHEMISTRY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2,499
5. CHEMISTRY	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	864
5. CHEMISTRY	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	700
5. CHEMISTRY	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,564
5. CHEMISTRY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	924
5. CHEMISTRY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	11
5. CHEMISTRY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	935
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	131
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	32
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	162
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	259
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	50
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	309
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	35
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	13
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	48
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	336
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	55
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	391
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	260
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	45
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	306
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	307
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	46
5. CHEMISTRY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	354
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4.13
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	12.99
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	5.29
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	27
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	31
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	27
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	38.45
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	40.96
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	38.77
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	23
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	17
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	20.56
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	23.30
5. CHEMISTRY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	20.92
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	106
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	14
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	120
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	96
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	14
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	110
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	8.54
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	19.37
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	9.15
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	178
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	21
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	199
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	126
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	20
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	145
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	52
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	54
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	14.38
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	28.02
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	15.15
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	498
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	459
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	956
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	488
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	459
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	946
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	1,275
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	375
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	1,650
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	531
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	372
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	903
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	745
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	3
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	747
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	101
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	16
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	117
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	194
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	30
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	223
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	31
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	4
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	34
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	267
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	37
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	304
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	230
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	31
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	261
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	269
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	35
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	304
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	2.92
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	10.68
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	3.73
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	22
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	21
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	22
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	38.04
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	49.16
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	39.20
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	19
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	17
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	23.30
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	26.26
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	23.61
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	46
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	16
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	63
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	27
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	16
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	43
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	20
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	20
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	22.26
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	31.73
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	24.14
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	62
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	27
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	90
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	39
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	25
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	65
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	23
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	25
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	29.90
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	52.86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	34.47
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	179
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	77
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	256
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	93
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	77
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	169
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	513
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	336
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	849
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	334
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	328
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	662
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	179
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	8
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	187
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	29
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	15
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	65
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	21
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	4
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	9
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	14
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	69
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	18
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	87
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	30
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	14
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	44
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	38
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	12
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	50
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8.60
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	16.57
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	10.32
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	47
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	39.94
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	28.22
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	37.41
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	28
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	19
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	18.70
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	12.24
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	203
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	217
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	163
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	177
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	10.56
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	25.23
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	10.97
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	314
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	18
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	333
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	223
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	17
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	240
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	91
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	92
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	16.31
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	33.38
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	16.79
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	736
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	59
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	796
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	643
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	59
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	703
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	93
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	93
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	2,123
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	236
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2,359
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	1,552
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	225
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,777
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	571
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	581
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	258
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	270
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	155
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	8
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	163
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	261
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	20
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	281
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	239
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	21
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	260
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	262
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	13
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	275
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	21.60
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	4.44
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	20.78
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	4
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.42
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13.54
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	48.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	15.24
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	12
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	20.45
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	4.44
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	19.67
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	165
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	177
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	114
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	9
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	123
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	51
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	53
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	5.04
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	15.58
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	5.28
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	164
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	179
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	108
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	13
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	121
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	56
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	59
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	5.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	20.96
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	5.35
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	293
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	339
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	225
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	43
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	268
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	68
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	3
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	71
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	716
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	90
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	806
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	632
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	697
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	109
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	124
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	136
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	199
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	215
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	14
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	3
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	264
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	290
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	189
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	20
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	209
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	227
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	252
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9.61
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	13.50
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	9.87
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	24
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.20
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.19
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	20.65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	41.08
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	22.02
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	18
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7.33
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	37.50
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	9.35
8. METALLURGY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	29
8. METALLURGY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	6
8. METALLURGY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	36
8. METALLURGY	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	22
8. METALLURGY	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	6
8. METALLURGY	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	29
8. METALLURGY	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	7
8. METALLURGY	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
8. METALLURGY	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	7
8. METALLURGY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	4.37
8. METALLURGY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	12.95
8. METALLURGY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	4.97
8. METALLURGY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	77
8. METALLURGY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	10
8. METALLURGY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	86
8. METALLURGY	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	34
8. METALLURGY	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	10
8. METALLURGY	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	44
8. METALLURGY	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	42
8. METALLURGY	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
8. METALLURGY	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	42
8. METALLURGY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	11.50
8. METALLURGY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	19.62
8. METALLURGY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	12.07
8. METALLURGY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	86
8. METALLURGY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	10
8. METALLURGY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	96
8. METALLURGY	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	70
8. METALLURGY	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	10
8. METALLURGY	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	81
8. METALLURGY	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	16
8. METALLURGY	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
8. METALLURGY	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	16
8. METALLURGY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	177
8. METALLURGY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	52
8. METALLURGY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	229
8. METALLURGY	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	71
8. METALLURGY	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	52
8. METALLURGY	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	123
8. METALLURGY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	106
8. METALLURGY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
8. METALLURGY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	106
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	37
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	3
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	40
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	94
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	100
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	26
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	26
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	97
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	17
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	114
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	92
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	15
8. METALLURGY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	107
8. METALLURGY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	105
8. METALLURGY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	15
8. METALLURGY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	120
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	6.60
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	5.03
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	6.41
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	10
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	15
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.14
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	2.76
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24.20
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	39.88
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	26.08
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	29
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	11
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14.01
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	10.80
8. METALLURGY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	13.62
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	21
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	25
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	16
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	19
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	5.05
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	9.44
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	5.40
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	53
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	7
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	59
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	20
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	7
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	26
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	33
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	33
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	12.62
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	18.51
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	13.09
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	37
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	40
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	31
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	35
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	111
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	9
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	120
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	34
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	9
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	43
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	78
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	78
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	29
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	32
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	77
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	82
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	21
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	21
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	62
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	10
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	72
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	64
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	8
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	71
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	70
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	8
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	77
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	2.26
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	7.96
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	2.89
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	16
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	13
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13.06
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	21.95
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	14.04
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	8
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	6
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5.30
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	4.71
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	8
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	11
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	9
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	2
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	2
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	3.24
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	22.69
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	4.22
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	24
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	27
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	15
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	9
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	9
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	9.63
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	22.69
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	10.29
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	49
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	56
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	39
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	46
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	10
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	10
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	66
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	43
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	109
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	37
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	43
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	80
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	28
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	28
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	8
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	8
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	5
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	5
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	34
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	42
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	29
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	36
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	35
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	42
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16.42
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	14.11
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	22
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	19
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.22
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	8.78
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	49.37
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	70.67
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	52.37
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	64
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	24
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	33.69
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	29.33
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	33.07
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	439
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	9
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	448
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	293
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	9
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	302
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	146
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	146
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	6.65
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	15.31
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	6.73
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	622
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	636
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	369
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	12
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	381
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	252
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	255
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	9.43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	23.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	9.55
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	1,093
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	1,136
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	717
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	760
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	376
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	376
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	2,662
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	228
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2,890
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	1,729
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	180
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,909
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	932
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	49
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	981
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	413
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	13
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	425
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	359
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	7
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	366
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	3
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	474
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	23
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	497
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	379
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	393
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	469
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	489
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18.78
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	19.14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	18.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	19
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	2.13
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	3.78
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	2.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.88
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	28.72
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	11.33
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	6
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18.26
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	27.71
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	18.50
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	663
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	754
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	566
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	90
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	655
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	97
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	9.69
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	30.80
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	10.57
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	1,110
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	109
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	1,219
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	863
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	102
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	965
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	247
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	7
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	254
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	16.23
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	36.86
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	17.08
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	1,793
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	1,299
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	3,092
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	1,670
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	1,277
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	2,947
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	123
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	22
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	145
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	5,063
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	3,403
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	8,466
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	4,379
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	3,352
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	7,731
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	683
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	52
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	735
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	753
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	78
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	832
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	827
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	75
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	901
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	42
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	17
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	883
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	974
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	1,006
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	97
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	1,103
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	1,040
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	1,129
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.08
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	21.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	15.59
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	24
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	2.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	1.03
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	12.66
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	23.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	13.50
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	22
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	21.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	15.59
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	322
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	17
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	339
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	286
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	16
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	302
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	36
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	37
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	9.35
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	26.87
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	9.67
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	624
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	23
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	647
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	480
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	21
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	500
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	144
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	3
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	147
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	18.15
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	37.03
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	18.49
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	883
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	109
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	992
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	840
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	87
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	927
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	43
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	22
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	65
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	2,893
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	359
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	3,252
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	2,551
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	310
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	2,861
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	343
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	48
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	391
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	457
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	18
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	475
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	472
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	16
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	488
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	10
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	2
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	12
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	394
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	16
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	410
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	510
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	18
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	528
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	537
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	14
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	551
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17.50
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	32.49
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	18.02
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	27
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	18
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	27
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7.11
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	13.71
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	7.34
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	28
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11.57
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	13.71
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	11.64
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	6
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	6
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	11.07
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	9
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	9
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	16.73
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	91
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	91
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	143
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	143
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	7
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	13
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	6
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	15
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	13
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	15
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	9.03
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	39
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	9.03
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	25.00
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	19
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	29.17
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	112
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	26
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	139
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	75
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	26
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	101
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	37
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	37
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	9.97
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	42.24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	11.65
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	174
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	31
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	205
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	122
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	28
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	150
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	51
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	3
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	55
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	15.43
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	50.18
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	17.24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	342
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	574
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	916
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	292
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	574
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	865
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	51
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	51
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	645
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	1,508
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2,153
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	522
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	1,505
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	2,027
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	123
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	3
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	126
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	85
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	23
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	108
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	104
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	21
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	125
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	7
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	5
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	12
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	163
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	23
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	185
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	143
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	167
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	120
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	144
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5.40
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	22.45
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	7.36
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	25
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	31
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	26
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	3.30
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.38
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.75
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	29.30
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	12.88
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	17
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	12
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	13.29
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	18.89
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	13.93
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	40
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	49
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	40
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	49
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	11.63
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	32.55
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	13.23
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	52
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	61
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	49
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	58
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	3
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	15.17
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	34.12
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	16.63
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	96
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	182
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	277
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	96
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	182
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	277
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	258
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	109
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	368
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	253
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	109
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	362
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	6
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	6
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	60
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	7
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	67
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	64
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	73
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	8
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	2
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	81
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	91
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	88
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	11
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	99
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	74
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	83
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17.06
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	21.25
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	17.50
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	26
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	12
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	2.08
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	1.86
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	29.73
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	37.73
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	30.56
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	30
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	30
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	30
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	29.81
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	44.32
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	31.33
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	12
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	15
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	15
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	6.24
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	23.08
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	7.35
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	20
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	2
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	22
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	17
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	10.89
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	15.38
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	11.18
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	64
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	83
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	64
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	83
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	92
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	120
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	86
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	114
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	6
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	6
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	25
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	23
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	4
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	1
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	5
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	37
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	5
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	42
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	44
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	6
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	49
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	29
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	4
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	33
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	25.29
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	15.38
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	24.18
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	46
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	22
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5.28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	4.68
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	45.53
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	53.85
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	46.46
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	29
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	54
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	32
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	28.09
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	53.85
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	30.99
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	28
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	34
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	28
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	34
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	18.06
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	40.58
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	20.09
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	32
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	8
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	39
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	32
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	8
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	39
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	20.30
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	50.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	22.97
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	77
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	118
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	195
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	77
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	118
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	195
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	167
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	81
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	248
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	167
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	81
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	248
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	35
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	4
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	39
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	41
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	4
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	45
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	4
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	1
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	5
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	43
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	49
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	44
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	50
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	44
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	50
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11.72
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	25.64
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	13.10
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	12
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	5
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19.46
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	25.64
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	20.08
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	31
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	12
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	29
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	30.93
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	37.18
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	31.55
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	105
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	7
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	112
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	91
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	7
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	98
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	19.51
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	40.17
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	20.17
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	110
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	8
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	118
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	97
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	8
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	105
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	20.61
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	43.02
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	21.32
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	283
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	67
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	350
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	270
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	67
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	337
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	800
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	127
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	927
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	696
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	127
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	823
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	104
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	104
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	61
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	6
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	67
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	81
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	85
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	12
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	12
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	76
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	4
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	80
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	82
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	6
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	88
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	93
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	7
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	100
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16.42
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	11.70
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	16.23
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	18
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	24
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	6.08
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	5.83
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18.98
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	23.97
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	19.19
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	36
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	15
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.02
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	17.55
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	15.12
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	64
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	27
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	91
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	56
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	27
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	83
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	8
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	8
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	8.31
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	27.88
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	10.48
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	99
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	32
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	131
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	80
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	30
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	111
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	19
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	20
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	12.81
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	32.73
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	15.01
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	121
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	261
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	382
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	107
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	261
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	368
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	13
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	13
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	272
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	1,113
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	1,385
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	215
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	1,113
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,328
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	57
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	57
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	66
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	16
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	83
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	72
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	16
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	88
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	3
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	3
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	130
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	28
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	158
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	132
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	29
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	161
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	161
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	28
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	189
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15.61
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	17.53
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	15.94
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	11
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	17
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	2.60
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.44
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	22.97
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	23.34
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	23.04
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	27
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	19
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	26
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24.15
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	26.99
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	24.63
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	15
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	19
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	3
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	2.71
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	14.81
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	3.26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	42
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	5
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	47
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	5
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	31
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	7.45
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	18.52
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	7.95
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	58
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	84
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	55
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	81
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	151
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	87
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	238
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	100
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	87
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	187
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	51
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	51
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	18
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	7
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	24
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	22
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	8
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	30
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	9
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	35
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	9
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	48
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	41
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	7
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	48
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11.94
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	16.39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	12.56
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	21
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	25
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	21
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	16.39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	2.26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.47
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	16.39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	11.29
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.65
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	9.18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	7
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	8
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	7
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	1.69
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	7.58
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	1.87
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	17
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	12
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	4.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	7.58
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	4.11
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	33
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	34
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	30
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	31
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	2
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	2
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	52
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	53
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	10
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	11
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	42
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	42
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	7
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	11
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	2
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	13
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	3
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	9
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	3
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	21
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	3
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	21
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14.57
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	13.59
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	28
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	26
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	67
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	5
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	2
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	2
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	5.56
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	4
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	4
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	11.11
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	10
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	9
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	1
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	37
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	36
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	1
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	3
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	2
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	1
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	8
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	8
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	9
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	10.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	10
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	10.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	60.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	30
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	30.00
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	9
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	6.47
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	22.73
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	7.66
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	22
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	25
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	21
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	4
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	4
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	20.06
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	34.09
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	21.09
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	23
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	41
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	23
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	41
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	91
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	56
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	147
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	84
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	56
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	140
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	9
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	14
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	10
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	14
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	13
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	14
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	19
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	15
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11.45
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	13.89
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	11.96
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	28
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	13.89
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	2.93
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7.43
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	27.78
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	11.73
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	13
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19.07
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	15.05
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	277
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	8
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	285
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	224
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	7
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	231
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	53
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	7.30
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	28.77
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	7.46
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	397
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	12
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	409
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	283
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	9
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	293
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	113
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	3
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	116
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	10.45
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	41.41
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	10.68
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	868
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	83
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	951
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	686
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	82
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	768
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	182
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	1
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	183
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	1,904
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	156
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2,060
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	1,525
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	150
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,675
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	379
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	6
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	385
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	410
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	11
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	421
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	372
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	13
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	385
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	176
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	5
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	180
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	521
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	9
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	529
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	488
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	497
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	532
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	7
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	539
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18.34
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	29.80
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	18.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	42
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	15
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	17.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	3.87
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19.07
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	22.78
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	19.14
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	16
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16.50
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	17.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	16.51
11.1 FURNITURE	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	176
11.1 FURNITURE	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	6
11.1 FURNITURE	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	182
11.1 FURNITURE	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	156
11.1 FURNITURE	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	5
11.1 FURNITURE	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	161
11.1 FURNITURE	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	19
11.1 FURNITURE	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
11.1 FURNITURE	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	21
11.1 FURNITURE	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	5.82
11.1 FURNITURE	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	29.94
11.1 FURNITURE	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	5.98
11.1 FURNITURE	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	232
11.1 FURNITURE	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	7
11.1 FURNITURE	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	239
11.1 FURNITURE	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	177
11.1 FURNITURE	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	6
11.1 FURNITURE	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	183
11.1 FURNITURE	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	55
11.1 FURNITURE	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
11.1 FURNITURE	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	56
11.1 FURNITURE	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	7.67
11.1 FURNITURE	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	35.03
11.1 FURNITURE	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	7.85
11.1 FURNITURE	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	438
11.1 FURNITURE	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	22
11.1 FURNITURE	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	461
11.1 FURNITURE	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	364
11.1 FURNITURE	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	21
11.1 FURNITURE	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	385
11.1 FURNITURE	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	74
11.1 FURNITURE	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	1
11.1 FURNITURE	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	75
11.1 FURNITURE	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	1,031
11.1 FURNITURE	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	73
11.1 FURNITURE	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	1,104
11.1 FURNITURE	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	842
11.1 FURNITURE	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	71
11.1 FURNITURE	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	914
11.1 FURNITURE	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	189
11.1 FURNITURE	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	1
11.1 FURNITURE	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	190
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	264
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	8
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	272
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	252
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	8
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	260
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	98
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	2
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	100
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	412
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	6
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	419
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	388
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	7
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	396
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	440
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	4
11.1 FURNITURE	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	444
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14.17
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	26.13
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	14.36
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	44
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	10
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.47
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	18.02
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.75
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	19.44
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	26.13
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	19.55
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	16
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18.39
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	18.02
11.1 FURNITURE	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	18.38
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	101
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	104
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	67
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	70
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	34
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	34
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	13.04
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	26.14
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	13.19
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	165
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	5
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	170
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	106
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	4
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	110
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	59
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	1
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	60
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	21.27
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	55.68
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	21.65
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	429
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	61
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	491
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	322
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	61
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	383
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	108
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	108
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	872
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	84
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	956
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	683
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	78
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	761
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	190
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	5
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	195
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	145
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	4
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	149
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	120
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	125
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	78
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	80
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	109
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	111
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	99
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	102
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	92
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	95
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	30.57
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	37.10
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	30.73
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	30
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	37
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	30
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	12.90
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	16.13
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	12.97
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17.98
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	16.13
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	17.94
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	16
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10.95
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	16.13
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	11.07
12. RECYCLING	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	0.00
12. RECYCLING	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2
12. RECYCLING	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	2
12. RECYCLING	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	3.14
12. RECYCLING	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2
12. RECYCLING	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	2
12. RECYCLING	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	7
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	6
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	6
12. RECYCLING	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	6
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	28
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	44.00
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	0
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	..
12. RECYCLING	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	72.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	5
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	7
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	12
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	6
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	9
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	1
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	1.25
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	17.13
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	2.84
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	14
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	10
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	23
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	8
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	20
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	1
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	3.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	23.28
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	5.62
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	11
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	20
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	31
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	8
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	10
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	18
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	10
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	13
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	22
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	46
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	68
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	21
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	36
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	56
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	1
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	10
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	11
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	6
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	9
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	12
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	5
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	17
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	2
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	2
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	2
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	4
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	6
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	12
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	3
13. ENERGY AND WATER	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	15
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9.28
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	43.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	21.82
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	44
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	22
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7.50
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	15.24
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	10.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	15
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	6
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	15.24
13. ENERGY AND WATER	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	5.56
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	166
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	11
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	177
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	147
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	9
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	156
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	19
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	2
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	20
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	0.59
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	5.02
14. CONSTRUCTION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	0.62
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	248
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	16
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	264
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	147
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	11
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	158
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	101
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	5
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	106
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	0.88
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	7.48
14. CONSTRUCTION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	0.93
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	257
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	25
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	282
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	220
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	24
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	244
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	37
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	2
14. CONSTRUCTION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	39
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	592
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	160
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	752
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	491
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	148
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	639
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	101
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	12
14. CONSTRUCTION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	113
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	176
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	8
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	184
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	56
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	10
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	66
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	30
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	7
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	37
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	214
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	19
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	233
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	243
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	25
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	268
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	415
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	26
14. CONSTRUCTION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	440
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	10.03
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	0.45
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	10
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	4
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.94
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	2.89
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	3.90
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	15.81
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	0.72
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	10
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	19
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	10
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14.00
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	32.40
14. CONSTRUCTION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	14.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	605
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	24
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	630
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	225
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	228
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	380
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	21
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	401
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	1.50
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	4.81
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	1.54
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	907
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	35
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	942
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	361
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	6
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	367
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	547
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	29
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	575
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	2.25
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	6.91
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	2.31
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	1,668
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	244
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	1,912
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	856
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	197
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,054
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	812
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	46
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	858
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	2,107
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	443
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	2,550
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	844
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	406
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,249
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	1,264
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	37
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	1,301
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	671
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	29
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	700
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	1,144
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	30
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	1,175
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	259
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	10
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	269
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	414
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	15
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	429
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	473
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	21
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	494
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	829
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	27
15. TRADE AND CATERING	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	856
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7.10
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	9.11
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	7.16
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	28
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	30
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	29
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5.58
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	6.64
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	5.61
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4.57
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	9.89
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	4.73
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	10
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	4
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	6.02
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	13.02
15. TRADE AND CATERING	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	6.22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	2
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	7
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	0.50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	1.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	0.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	36
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	8
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	0.50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	2.30
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	0.54
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	12
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	45
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	12
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	43
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	62
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	4
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	36
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	56
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	9
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	64
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	103
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	9
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	112
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	105
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	18
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	122
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	6.25
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	10.74
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	6.79
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	6
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	6
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	6
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	4.60
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.56
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9.10
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	14.05
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	9.69
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	32
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	29
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5.40
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	4.75
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	2.81
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	2.72
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	2.81
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	2.72
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	9
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	9
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	51
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	51
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	32
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	32
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	7
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	2
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	9
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	6
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	6
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	4
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	1
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	18
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	6
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	8
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	30
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	3
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7.40
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	6.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	9.92
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	1.50
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	10
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	23.82
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	59.92
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	29.26
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	3.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	2.95
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	3.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	2.95
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	1
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	1
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	5
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	2.22
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	2.06
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	2.22
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	2.06
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	6
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	2
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	8
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	4
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	4
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	4
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	1
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	18
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	6
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	24
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	21
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	8
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	29
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	2
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	12.02
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	9.33
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	9.92
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	2.22
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	39
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	10
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	33
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	38.68
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	59.92
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	43.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	2.56
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	0.27
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	4
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	7
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	4
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	7
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	0.39
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	2.56
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	0.62
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	2
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	2
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	12
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	44
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	55
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	12
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	44
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	55
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	5
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	8
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	38
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	13
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	51
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	9
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	4
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	14
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	5
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	45
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	9
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	82
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	83
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	17
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	101
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	5.57
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	0.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	15
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	21
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	16
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	10.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	1.63
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	10.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	4.65
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	19
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	24.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	9.95
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	212
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	31
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	243
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	200
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	28
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	228
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	4
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	1.45
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	4.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	1.59
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	236
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	34
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	270
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	180
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	27
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	207
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	56
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	7
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	63
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	1.62
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	5.12
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	1.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	614
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	150
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	764
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	573
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	146
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	719
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	4
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	45
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	783
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	782
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	1,565
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	665
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	773
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	1,438
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	118
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	9
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	127
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	271
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	26
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	297
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	271
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	310
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	188
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	26
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	214
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	556
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	31
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	586
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	648
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	687
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	604
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	52
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	655
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	3.23
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	3.73
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	15
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	10
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8.62
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	14.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	8.97
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	17.41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	20.39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	17.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	20
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	19
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	19
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24.13
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	17.96
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	23.73
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	107
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	119
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	101
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	113
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	8.34
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	16.34
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	8.79
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	100
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	16
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	115
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	87
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	16
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	103
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	7.80
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	20.51
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	8.51
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	245
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	44
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	289
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	239
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	44
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	282
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	213
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	274
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	488
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	201
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	274
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	475
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	55
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	11
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	66
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	131
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	17
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	149
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	90
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	13
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	104
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	217
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	10
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	228
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	221
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	13
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	235
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	197
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	209
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4.39
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	4.13
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	16
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	24
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	17
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14.24
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	11.40
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	14.07
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	26.24
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	23.88
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	26.10
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	35
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	20
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	34
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	28.47
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	17.64
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	27.83
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	67
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	5
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	72
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	61
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	5
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	66
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	8.99
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	9.25
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	9.01
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	70
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	75
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	57
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	63
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	9.31
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	11.24
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	9.43
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	98
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	14
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	112
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	92
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	14
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	106
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	97
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	50
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	147
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	85
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	50
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	135
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	50
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	9
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	59
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	105
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	15
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	120
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	71
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	11
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	83
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	156
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	8
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	164
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	176
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	11
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	187
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	147
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	10
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	157
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	4.61
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	4.35
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	18
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	34
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	19
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	14.83
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	16.15
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	14.90
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	25.32
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	33.85
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	25.80
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	39
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	28
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	38
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	27.35
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	25.00
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	27.22
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	39
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	8
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	47
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	39
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	8
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	47
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	7.41
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	30.19
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	8.46
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	10
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	40
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	10
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	40
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	5.66
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	38.63
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	7.18
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	147
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	177
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	147
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	177
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	116
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	224
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	340
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	116
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	224
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	340
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	4
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	7
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	27
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	29
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	19
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	21
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	61
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	64
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	46
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	48
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	49
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	52
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.79
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	3.55
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	12
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	11
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	12.66
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	11.86
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	28.73
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	26.92
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	24
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	23
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	31.47
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	29.48
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	47
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	2
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	49
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	44
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	2
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	46
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	3
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	31.35
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	50.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	31.83
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	45
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	1
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	46
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	42
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	1
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	43
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	0
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	3
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	29.62
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	25.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	29.50
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	262
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	61
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	323
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	235
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	61
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	296
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	27
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	27
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	411
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	270
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	681
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	382
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	270
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	652
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	29
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	0
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	29
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	19
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	1
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	20
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	22
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	1
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	23
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	26
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	0
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	26
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	42
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	2
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	44
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	43
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	2
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	45
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	46
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	1
19.2 R+D SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	47
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11.35
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	11.09
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	11
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	50
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	12
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	21.33
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	20.84
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	41.54
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	40.59
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	32
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	0
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	31
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	34.39
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	33.60
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	58
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	17
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	75
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	55
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	13
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	68
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	3
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	4
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	7
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	0.44
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	2.93
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	0.54
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	92
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	17
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	109
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	51
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	10
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	61
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	41
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	7
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	48
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	0.70
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	2.96
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	0.79
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	107
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	45
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	152
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	99
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	41
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	140
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	4
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	12
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	159
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	237
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	396
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	82
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	229
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	311
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	77
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	86
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	198
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	13
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	211
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	117
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	21
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	138
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	72
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	13
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	85
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	296
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	18
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	315
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	384
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	24
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	408
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	361
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	39
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	400
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	2.38
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	4.91
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	2.57
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	5
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	5
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.34
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	15.78
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	4.29
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8.58
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	19.46
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	9.41
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	8
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	19
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	20.01
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	18.78
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	19.92
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	137
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	16
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	153
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	27
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	250 or more employees	4
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A1): Innovative	Total 2000	31
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	110
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	250 or more employees	12
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A2) Non innovative	Total 2000	122
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Less than 250 employees	1.57
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	250 or more employees	7.84
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(A3) % of companies with patent application	Total 2000	1.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	152
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	18
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	170
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Less than 250 employees	49
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	250 or more employees	4
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B1): Innovative	Total 2000	53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Less than 250 employees	103
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	250 or more employees	14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B2): Non innovative	Total 2000	116
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Less than 250 employees	1.74
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	250 or more employees	9.06
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(B3): % of companies with patents in force	Total 2000	1.91
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Less than 250 employees	229
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	250 or more employees	26
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000	Total 2000	255
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	250 or more employees	7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C1): From innovative companies	Total 2000	26
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	210
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	250 or more employees	19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(C2): From non innovative companies	Total 2000	229
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Less than 250 employees	332
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	250 or more employees	58
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000	Total 2000	391
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	88
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	250 or more employees	5
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D1) From innovative companies	Total 2000	93
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Less than 250 employees	245
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	250 or more employees	53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(D2) From non-innovative companies	Total 2000	297
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Less than 250 employees	160
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	250 or more employees	6
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs	Total 2000	167
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Less than 250 employees	91
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	250 or more employees	11
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames	Total 2000	102
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Less than 250 employees	110
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	250 or more employees	15
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties	Total 2000	125
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Less than 250 employees	54
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	250 or more employees	7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret	Total 2000	61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Less than 250 employees	71
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	250 or more employees	8
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design	Total 2000	79
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Less than 250 employees	99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	250 or more employees	14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors	Total 2000	112
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Less than 250 employees	9.17
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	250 or more employees	5.19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance	Total 2000	8.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Less than 250 employees	7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	250 or more employees	14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance	Total 2000	7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Less than 250 employees	21.15
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	250 or more employees	25.94
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance	Total 2000	21.59
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Less than 250 employees	3.83
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	250 or more employees	2.68
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance	Total 2000	3.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Less than 250 employees	6
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	250 or more employees	0
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance	Total 2000	5
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Less than 250 employees	6.05
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	250 or more employees	9.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES	(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance	Total 2000	6.37