Economic activity;Characteristic of company;Size of the company;Total
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.85
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;9.10
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;13.79
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;19.66
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;12.91
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;19.58
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.08
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;10.21
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;12.06
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.30
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;4.61
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;5.29
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.75
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;6.62
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;10.69
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.95
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;3.95
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;7.90
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.36
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;3.14
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;6.32
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.76
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;5.34
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;7.73
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.77
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;7.34
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;8.75
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;20.54
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;22.15
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;20.56
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;41.75
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;41.09
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;41.74
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;22.71
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;17.91
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;22.64
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.34
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;13.51
TOTAL COMPANIES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;18.12
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;32.06
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;21.94
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;31.59
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.66
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;12.72
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;18.39
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;5.04
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;6.56
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;5.11
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;13.45
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;7.58
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;13.18
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;8.12
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;2.80
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;7.88
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;9.11
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;4.04
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;8.88
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;11.07
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;8.79
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;10.97
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;9.85
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;6.70
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;9.70
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;12.58
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;12.57
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;12.58
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;7.42
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;7.16
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;7.41
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;18.18
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;19.45
TOTAL COMPANIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;18.24
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;22.97
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;32.06
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;23.39
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;17.43
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;21.00
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;17.59
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;40.47
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;41.12
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;40.50
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;19.22
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;25.09
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;19.49
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;25.94
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;29.10
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;26.08
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;12.69
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;17.02
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;12.89
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;7.09
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;10.18
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;7.23
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;15.09
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;20.99
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;15.36
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;23.73
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;25.73
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;23.82
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;31.44
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;53.85
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;32.47
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;9.96
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;27.56
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;10.77
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;23.97
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;27.68
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;24.14
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;16.73
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;24.10
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;17.07
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;10.36
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;11.89
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;10.43
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;2.26
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;6.33
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;2.45
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.17
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.56
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;4.33
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;10.24
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;12.02
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;10.32
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;15.97
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;10.92
TOTAL COMPANIES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;15.74
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;21.88
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;11.48
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.52
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;34.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;17.83
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.41
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;12.50
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;4.56
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.66
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;18.75
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;4.92
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.41
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;9.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;8.42
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.73
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;9.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;5.79
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;2.59
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;2.54
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.06
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;8.89
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.56
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;12.50
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;7.65
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;23.67
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;21.88
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;23.64
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;44.49
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;18.75
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;44.02
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;23.67
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;34.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;23.86
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;14.05
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;13.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;28.76
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;25.64
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;28.58
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;16.88
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;15.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;16.80
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;5.19
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;4.89
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;12.25
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;11.55
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;1.14
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;1.08
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;6.40
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;6.04
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;22.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;19.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;22.42
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;9.05
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;8.54
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;14.01
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;13.22
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;7.72
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;7.28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;17.06
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;16.09
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;13.01
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;12.71
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;19.33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;18.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;38.18
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;19.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;37.10
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;16.04
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;29.49
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;16.80
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;24.61
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;10.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;23.79
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;11.66
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;10.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;11.58
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;9.93
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;33.33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;11.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;42.93
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;48.72
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;43.26
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;37.60
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;46.15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;38.08
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;29.40
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;44.87
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;30.28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;11.07
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;15.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;11.32
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;22.73
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;26.92
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;22.97
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;7.13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;15.38
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;7.60
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;8.86
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;34.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;10.32
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;1.73
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;2.07
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;6.98
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.69
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;7.02
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.19
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;56.41
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;7.16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;10.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;33.33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;11.91
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;21.57
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;2.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;21.38
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;29.52
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;5.86
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;29.28
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.95
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;12.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.71
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;2.35
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;6.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.53
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;5.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;12.46
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;9.17
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.64
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;6.57
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;2.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;8.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.85
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;9.75
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;25.77
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;16.92
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;25.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;43.91
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;35.05
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;43.82
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;33.08
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;22.78
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;32.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;25.33
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;16.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;24.88
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;37.87
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;28.65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;37.37
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.64
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;13.66
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;17.43
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;7.89
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;1.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;7.52
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;10.16
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;5.05
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;9.89
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;8.80
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;0.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;8.37
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;10.86
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;6.82
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;10.65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;16.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;12.11
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;16.04
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;14.40
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;4.63
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;13.87
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;9.89
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;16.93
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;10.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;8.14
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;5.84
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;8.02
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;17.78
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;13.32
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;17.54
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;25.65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;36.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;26.26
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;19.25
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;29.63
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;19.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;47.53
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;37.48
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;46.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;25.33
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;19.76
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;25.03
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;41.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;32.21
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;41.45
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;14.29
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;19.59
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;14.58
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;9.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;18.34
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;9.60
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;22.77
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;29.06
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;23.11
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;33.83
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;36.69
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;33.98
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;28.62
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;50.29
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;29.79
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;7.51
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;20.12
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;8.20
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;29.99
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;32.04
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;30.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;16.16
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;14.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;16.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;7.52
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;8.08
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;7.55
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;3.06
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;3.31
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;2.28
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;6.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;2.51
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;11.84
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;14.71
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;11.99
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;19.41
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;11.90
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;19.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;22.75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;17.39
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;22.73
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;32.26
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;32.21
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;16.40
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;8.70
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;16.37
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.22
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;4.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;7.21
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;11.22
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;8.41
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.14
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;17.39
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;8.18
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.65
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.72
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.26
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;9.22
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;22.29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;26.09
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;22.31
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;47.61
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;43.48
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;47.60
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;30.75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;21.74
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;30.71
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.93
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;17.65
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;39.36
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;17.07
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;38.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;16.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;16.44
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;3.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;3.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;15.81
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;15.57
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;9.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;6.10
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;9.58
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;8.75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;8.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;9.16
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;7.32
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;9.12
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;8.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;8.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;12.84
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;10.98
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;12.80
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;1.08
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;1.05
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;17.48
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;14.63
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;17.42
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;18.13
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;28.05
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;18.34
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;12.11
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;13.41
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;12.14
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;38.46
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;48.78
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;38.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;24.77
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;23.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;24.73
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;31.28
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;18.29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;31.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;12.89
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;15.85
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;12.96
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;8.45
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;13.41
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;8.55
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;13.25
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;30.49
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;13.62
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;13.79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;23.17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;13.99
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;25.85
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;43.90
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;26.24
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;5.50
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;14.63
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;5.70
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;23.83
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;25.61
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;23.87
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;10.56
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;28.05
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;10.94
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;4.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;4.88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;4.66
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;0.35
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;0.34
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.95
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;0.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;4.84
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;6.93
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.32
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;6.94
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;21.53
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;34.15
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;21.81
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;19.20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;18.90
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;27.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;27.43
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;17.26
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.61
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;5.52
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.57
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;9.43
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.66
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;7.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;6.10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.47
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;8.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.79
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;1.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;9.65
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;25.06
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;19.76
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;24.97
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;42.01
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;63.08
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;42.37
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;30.10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;8.55
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;29.73
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;23.52
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;17.92
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;23.39
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;33.39
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;26.21
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;33.22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;28.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;3.83
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;27.96
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;7.73
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;5.14
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;7.67
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;17.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;3.83
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;16.71
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;9.08
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;0.00
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;8.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;8.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;8.35
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;8.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;13.65
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;5.14
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;13.45
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;9.71
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;14.10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;9.81
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;10.58
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;12.80
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;10.63
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;6.60
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;3.83
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;6.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;14.55
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;19.16
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;14.66
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;23.39
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;44.13
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;23.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;18.05
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;12.80
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;17.93
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;39.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;57.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;39.44
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;26.96
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;49.95
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;27.50
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;35.93
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;35.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;35.93
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;12.86
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;12.19
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;12.85
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;7.11
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;16.63
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;7.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;21.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;14.72
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;20.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;22.08
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;28.28
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;22.22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;26.19
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;58.38
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;26.94
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;8.20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;27.51
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;8.65
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;29.78
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;33.95
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;29.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;14.70
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;17.92
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;14.78
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;8.23
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;14.72
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;8.38
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;0.79
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;3.22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;0.85
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;1.17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.05
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;1.31
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;13.56
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;13.49
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;13.56
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;22.71
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;16.17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;22.56
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.04
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;16.53
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;19.94
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;6.27
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;19.53
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;15.81
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;15.33
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;0.53
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;6.27
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;0.70
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.81
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;3.70
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.28
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;3.18
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.51
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;3.40
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.96
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;4.82
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.09
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;6.87
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;20.91
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;17.41
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;20.80
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;44.05
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;13.68
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;43.14
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;28.12
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;27.28
5. CHEMISTRY;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.67
5. CHEMISTRY;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;19.47
5. CHEMISTRY;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;18.76
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;35.16
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;18.60
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;33.26
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;14.72
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;11.26
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;14.32
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;3.66
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;3.14
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;3.60
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;3.80
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;2.18
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;3.62
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;8.43
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;2.21
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;7.72
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;3.24
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;5.49
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;3.50
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;7.42
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;5.72
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;7.23
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;7.85
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;7.83
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;7.84
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;16.54
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;11.38
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;15.95
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;7.56
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;8.92
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;7.72
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;19.75
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;12.84
5. CHEMISTRY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;18.96
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;28.28
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;45.62
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;30.26
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;23.02
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;28.35
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;23.63
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;40.84
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;39.89
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;40.73
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;17.06
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;26.31
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;18.12
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;26.94
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;38.90
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;28.31
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;17.53
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;17.91
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;17.57
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;13.48
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;9.27
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;12.99
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;37.91
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;36.00
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;37.69
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;37.92
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;29.71
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;36.98
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;41.81
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;65.61
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;44.53
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;13.03
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;49.16
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;17.17
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;19.48
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;19.02
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;19.43
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;29.04
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;19.11
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;27.90
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;18.83
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;5.91
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;17.35
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;6.74
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;12.85
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;7.44
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;9.55
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;8.19
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;9.39
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;10.28
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;20.61
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;11.46
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;11.95
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;15.56
5. CHEMISTRY;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;12.36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.04
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;32.95
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;17.24
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;27.51
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;32.95
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;27.58
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;11.08
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.89
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;3.84
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.53
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;10.40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.20
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;7.11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;5.29
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.71
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;8.60
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.07
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;8.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;9.06
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;25.57
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;17.50
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;25.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;45.84
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;24.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;45.56
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;32.22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;8.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;31.92
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;23.03
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;16.29
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;22.71
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;37.67
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;13.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;36.53
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.43
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;12.94
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;8.05
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;5.76
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;13.26
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;12.90
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;7.36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;7.15
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;4.56
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;5.23
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;4.60
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;12.49
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;12.17
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;7.18
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;6.84
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;11.75
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;30.43
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;12.63
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;10.69
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;10.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;10.68
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;19.66
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;19.31
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;19.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;28.81
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;38.15
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;29.25
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;21.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;27.69
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;21.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;40.63
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;41.28
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;40.66
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;16.88
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;5.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;16.35
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;33.01
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;11.06
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;31.98
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;13.14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;13.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;13.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;11.47
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;5.23
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;11.17
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;15.61
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;21.94
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;15.91
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;26.48
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;19.53
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;26.15
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;31.88
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;36.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;32.08
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;12.93
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;10.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;12.81
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;20.88
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;26.87
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;21.16
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;33.55
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;43.80
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;34.04
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;12.62
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;11.06
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;12.54
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;1.35
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;1.42
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;3.49
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;3.46
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;9.67
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;9.22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;22.49
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;2.82
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;21.57
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;19.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;11.91
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;18.94
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;25.94
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;18.72
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;25.87
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.38
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;5.43
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;17.27
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;2.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;2.81
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;10.90
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.73
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;9.64
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;6.78
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.05
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.52
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;5.11
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;10.48
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;24.03
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;27.23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;24.06
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;44.90
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;39.47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;44.85
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;22.70
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;24.47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;22.72
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;22.47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;18.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;22.26
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;31.33
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;15.45
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;30.59
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.89
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;17.88
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;18.85
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;2.62
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;15.45
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;3.22
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;12.74
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;4.26
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;12.34
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;7.42
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;4.26
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;7.27
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;6.82
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;6.50
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;7.07
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;12.40
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;7.32
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;8.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;7.65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;8.78
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;15.63
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;6.70
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;15.21
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;5.37
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;11.07
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;5.64
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;11.81
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;12.40
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;11.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;19.02
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;31.51
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;19.60
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;16.65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;10.69
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;16.37
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;39.12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;52.89
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;39.76
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;15.71
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;25.19
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;16.16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;37.02
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;28.23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;36.60
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;6.89
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;13.51
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;7.19
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;7.53
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;17.28
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;7.99
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;16.79
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;28.23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;17.33
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;21.88
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;28.96
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;22.21
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;26.80
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;55.10
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;28.12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;4.36
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;13.01
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;4.77
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;18.37
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;40.14
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;19.39
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;11.62
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;14.35
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;11.75
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;8.25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;8.75
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;8.27
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;2.76
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;9.25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;3.06
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;6.25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;16.06
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;6.71
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;9.87
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;6.09
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;9.69
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;21.93
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;14.84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;21.60
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;23.05
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;22.66
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;36.50
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;19.78
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;36.22
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;15.65
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;15.39
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.60
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;11.41
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.78
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;12.57
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.74
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;13.51
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.69
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;7.56
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.11
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.99
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.94
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;6.82
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;28.56
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;13.69
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;28.31
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;40.71
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;29.28
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;40.51
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;37.44
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;36.81
8. METALLURGY;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.93
8. METALLURGY;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;10.02
8. METALLURGY;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;17.60
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;44.75
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;34.93
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;43.29
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;26.65
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;5.01
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;23.43
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;5.46
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;4.65
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;28.10
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;2.34
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;24.27
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;7.52
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;6.40
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;6.69
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;2.67
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;6.09
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;11.07
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;5.01
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;10.16
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;5.93
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;2.67
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;5.44
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;11.89
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;2.67
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;10.52
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;12.31
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;10.41
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;12.03
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;23.52
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;18.74
8. METALLURGY;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;22.81
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;26.12
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;35.78
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;27.56
8. METALLURGY;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;19.86
8. METALLURGY;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;24.66
8. METALLURGY;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;20.58
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;41.31
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;44.50
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;41.79
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;17.10
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;28.95
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;18.86
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;33.18
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;40.93
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;34.33
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;12.25
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;34.22
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;15.52
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;15.20
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;26.15
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;16.83
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;30.85
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;44.96
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;32.95
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;34.37
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;37.02
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;34.76
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;42.72
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;62.01
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;45.59
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;12.00
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;34.22
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;15.31
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;26.79
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;24.20
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;26.40
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;19.64
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;21.67
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;19.94
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;7.21
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;10.02
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;7.63
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.73
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.68
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;5.17
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;3.43
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;16.59
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;5.39
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;5.62
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;5.33
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;5.58
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;16.38
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;13.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;20.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;15.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;20.67
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;25.93
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;15.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;25.89
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;16.22
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;15.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;16.22
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.35
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;6.20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;6.35
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.12
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;13.08
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;6.20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;7.68
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.21
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;7.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.42
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.67
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;8.64
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;26.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;21.90
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;26.60
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;43.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;45.06
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;43.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;27.31
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;20.25
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;27.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;22.72
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;21.24
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;22.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;39.11
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;31.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;38.96
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;21.41
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;20.22
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;21.38
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;8.68
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;5.06
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;8.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;20.53
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;13.53
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;20.39
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;9.93
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;5.06
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;9.83
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;10.23
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;7.88
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;10.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;11.92
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;5.65
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;11.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;4.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;4.46
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;4.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;10.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;21.83
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;11.02
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;10.47
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;2.23
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;10.30
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;14.76
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;23.64
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;14.95
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;21.19
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;17.99
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;21.12
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;20.59
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;21.40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;20.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;41.86
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;43.24
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;41.89
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;26.10
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;37.59
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;26.34
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;36.03
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;48.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;36.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;17.69
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;32.53
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;18.00
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;7.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;2.82
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;7.08
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;20.27
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;31.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;20.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;27.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;39.20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;28.03
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;31.86
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;46.68
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;32.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;5.40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;10.70
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;5.51
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;21.49
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;29.71
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;21.66
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;22.86
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;36.57
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;23.15
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;8.47
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;15.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;8.61
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;3.98
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;11.72
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;4.14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;6.94
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;5.65
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;6.91
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;5.29
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;4.46
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;5.27
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;9.50
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;9.52
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;9.50
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;15.16
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;8.37
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;15.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;21.57
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;20.80
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;21.56
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;6.14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;10.99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.15
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;12.00
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;4.28
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;7.80
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;9.89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.35
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;5.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;6.34
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.67
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;1.68
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;3.64
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;7.58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.71
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.55
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;13.41
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;6.66
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;21.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;32.12
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;22.03
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;39.42
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;35.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;39.36
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;24.13
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;23.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;24.11
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;21.79
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;16.01
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;21.40
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;36.94
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;23.12
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;35.99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;20.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;12.91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;20.32
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;4.58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;5.31
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;4.63
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;17.65
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;8.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;17.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;8.20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;3.00
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;7.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;10.46
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;5.17
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;10.10
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;9.25
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;4.41
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;8.92
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;13.45
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;3.28
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;12.75
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;19.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;14.91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;19.58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;12.02
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;10.57
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;11.92
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;27.55
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;23.45
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;27.27
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;29.97
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;44.95
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;30.99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;19.27
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;30.47
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;20.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;40.42
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;47.89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;40.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;19.13
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;32.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;20.01
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;27.32
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;38.06
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;28.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;14.52
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;25.94
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;15.30
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;9.81
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;15.41
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;10.20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;15.63
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;21.74
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;16.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;32.40
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;28.82
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;32.15
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;38.22
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;55.20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;39.38
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;7.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;42.05
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;9.46
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;23.87
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;18.64
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;23.51
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;26.37
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;40.19
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;27.31
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;12.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;11.07
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;12.73
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;3.01
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;6.70
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;3.26
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.83
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.98
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;5.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;8.82
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;10.12
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;8.91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;18.72
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;13.51
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;18.36
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;21.82
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;21.80
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;29.73
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;29.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;16.01
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;15.99
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.48
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;8.47
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;14.94
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;14.93
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.43
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;9.42
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.13
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;10.12
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.87
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.86
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.49
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;10.48
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;22.58
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;22.56
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;40.73
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;40.69
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;32.20
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;32.16
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;26.78
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;18.23
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;26.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;43.46
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;13.24
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;42.91
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;29.03
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;22.93
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;28.92
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;7.22
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;13.24
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;7.33
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;22.69
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;19.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;22.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;15.49
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;5.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;15.29
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;14.30
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;18.23
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;14.37
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;11.75
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;11.62
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;10.10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;10.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;14.45
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;8.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;14.34
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;8.72
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;9.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;8.73
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;15.95
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;13.24
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;15.90
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;35.76
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;48.85
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;36.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;22.90
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;40.61
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;23.22
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;45.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;49.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;45.61
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;22.16
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;27.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;22.26
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;30.29
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;22.08
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;30.14
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;20.81
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;0.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;20.43
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;4.18
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;5.00
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;4.19
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;17.46
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;13.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;17.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;31.64
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;27.07
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;31.56
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;37.56
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;48.29
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;37.76
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;7.44
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;17.08
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;7.61
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;15.40
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;27.92
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;15.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;13.53
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;27.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;13.79
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;10.68
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;10.57
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;1.26
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;7.69
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;1.38
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;12.68
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;4.78
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;13.55
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;4.70
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;13.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;33.83
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;17.08
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;33.53
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;21.13
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;25.96
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;4.83
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;9.67
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;20.23
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;15.40
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;10.56
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.79
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;10.56
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;27.90
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;69.23
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;16.29
12. RECYCLING;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;21.35
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;42.75
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;19.69
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;7.27
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;3.64
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;0.00
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;0.00
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;33.93
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;25.03
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;21.35
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;14.12
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;48.01
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;19.64
12. RECYCLING;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;24.77
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;76.68
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;33.93
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;39.06
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;26.70
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;0.00
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;57.04
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;53.40
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;28.67
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;10.65
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;21.61
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;23.11
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;42.75
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;3.64
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;17.76
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;23.32
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;10.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;1.97
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;1.85
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.95
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;3.71
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.20
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;3.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;2.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;2.19
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;1.11
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;1.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;1.11
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;1.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;1.11
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;1.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.47
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;8.87
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;11.31
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.83
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;10.17
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;19.87
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;23.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;20.12
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;31.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;57.26
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;33.26
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;13.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;13.07
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.95
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;6.91
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;8.56
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;28.63
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;13.47
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;19.35
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;18.78
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;10.03
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;9.37
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;2.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;13.03
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;4.84
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;6.91
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;1.31
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;1.30
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;1.06
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;11.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;22.80
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;13.51
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;1.62
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;2.54
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;11.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;13.43
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;11.73
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;12.31
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;4.15
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;10.76
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;16.98
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;26.85
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;18.85
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;9.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;9.10
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;21.04
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;17.05
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;27.24
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;58.34
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;33.13
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;20.58
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;19.94
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;20.46
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;28.03
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;24.88
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;27.43
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;11.76
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;4.15
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;10.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;11.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;10.68
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;18.29
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;15.20
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;17.70
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;23.22
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;48.27
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;27.97
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;21.37
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;64.07
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;29.47
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;3.91
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;21.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;7.21
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;22.46
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;32.77
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;24.41
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;2.61
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;18.66
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;5.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;2.61
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;25.57
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;6.96
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.23
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;31.10
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;9.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;5.20
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;26.95
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;9.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;2.92
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;21.72
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;6.48
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;1.30
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;6.52
13. ENERGY AND WATER;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;2.29
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.32
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;8.10
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;13.29
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.72
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;6.03
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;18.64
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.07
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;4.64
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;13.02
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.64
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;8.10
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;6.65
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.33
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;5.54
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;13.29
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.25
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;4.64
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;11.22
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.08
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;4.87
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;9.06
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.33
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;5.54
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;8.32
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;9.16
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;6.96
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;9.14
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;17.34
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;23.83
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;17.38
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;42.56
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;50.62
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;42.61
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;19.94
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;11.70
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;19.89
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.13
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;9.07
14. CONSTRUCTION;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;10.10
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;28.38
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;18.75
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;28.15
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.65
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;22.07
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;8.98
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;4.15
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;12.49
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;4.35
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;8.99
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;13.56
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;9.10
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;12.48
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;1.46
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;12.21
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;15.21
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;14.84
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;16.64
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;5.58
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;16.38
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;5.42
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;20.09
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;5.77
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;7.08
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;9.07
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;7.12
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;6.29
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;4.00
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;6.23
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;18.90
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;13.58
14. CONSTRUCTION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;18.77
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;9.99
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;20.39
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;10.24
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;12.64
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;15.60
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;12.71
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;27.11
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;17.58
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;26.88
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;16.02
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;9.58
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;15.86
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;8.89
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;6.93
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;8.84
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;4.32
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;11.44
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;4.49
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;2.22
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;2.16
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;7.86
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;14.14
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;8.01
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;16.22
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;24.11
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;16.41
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16.59
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;39.55
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;17.14
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;3.50
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;25.97
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;4.04
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;23.48
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;17.75
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;23.34
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;8.84
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;14.65
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;8.98
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;6.35
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;12.39
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;6.49
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;1.42
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;5.46
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;1.51
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;2.89
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;16.12
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;3.21
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;5.36
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;9.85
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;5.47
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;5.29
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;1.46
14. CONSTRUCTION;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;5.20
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.39
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;8.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;12.35
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;17.74
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;11.92
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;17.68
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.80
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;11.78
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;8.83
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.23
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;3.46
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;5.22
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;6.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;10.79
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.78
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;4.50
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;6.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.78
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;3.32
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;5.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.75
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;1.82
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;7.68
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.22
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;3.77
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;7.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;22.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;22.27
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;22.87
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;41.45
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;37.11
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;41.41
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;21.57
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;17.31
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;21.52
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.54
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;4.71
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;12.36
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;22.12
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;15.42
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;21.96
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;14.45
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;8.47
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;14.31
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;3.66
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;12.90
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;3.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;12.39
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;6.47
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;12.25
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;5.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;1.12
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;5.08
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;7.09
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;1.12
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;6.95
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;8.06
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;13.09
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;8.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;12.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;7.45
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;12.75
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;10.59
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;3.91
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;10.43
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;5.63
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;9.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;5.70
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;13.85
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;18.02
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;13.94
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;19.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;11.99
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;19.01
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;14.41
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;10.05
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;14.30
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;39.63
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;36.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;39.54
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;10.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;15.95
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;10.96
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;16.93
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;19.88
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;17.00
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;12.67
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;16.68
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;12.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;6.01
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;4.52
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;5.98
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;8.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;19.53
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;8.30
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;20.70
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;23.06
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;20.75
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;28.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;54.20
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;29.43
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;14.34
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;32.63
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;14.77
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;24.96
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;31.37
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;25.11
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;11.77
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;15.18
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;11.85
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;12.37
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;9.00
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;12.29
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;0.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;2.16
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;0.79
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;0.95
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;4.48
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;1.03
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;12.79
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;15.76
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;12.86
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;18.22
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;12.56
15. TRADE AND CATERING;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;18.09
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.36
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;12.22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;13.35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;22.20
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;21.68
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;22.19
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.62
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;11.64
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;12.61
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;4.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;5.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.25
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;4.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;8.21
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.78
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;4.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;4.78
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;2.91
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;2.54
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;2.90
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.68
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;2.54
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;4.66
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.81
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;10.70
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;19.27
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;30.11
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;19.38
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;39.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;29.16
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;39.43
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;22.80
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;15.87
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;22.73
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;16.03
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;4.67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;15.31
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;20.70
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;18.04
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;20.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;13.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;7.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;13.13
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;7.49
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;6.17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;7.41
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;14.55
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;9.59
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;14.24
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;5.77
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;5.10
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;5.73
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;3.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;3.42
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;3.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;11.45
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;10.23
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;11.37
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;8.69
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;3.38
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;8.35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;14.19
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;11.22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;14.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;6.60
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;4.28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;6.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;13.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;11.01
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;12.87
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;17.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;16.75
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;17.47
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;12.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;8.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;12.28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;38.07
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;44.88
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;38.50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;19.47
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;17.21
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;19.33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;17.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;21.81
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;18.20
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;14.17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;12.44
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;14.06
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;5.84
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;7.77
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;5.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;18.93
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;12.29
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;18.51
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;16.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;15.11
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;16.38
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;32.92
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;48.06
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;33.87
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;11.86
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;16.67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;12.16
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;28.27
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;31.28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;28.46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;13.27
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;10.62
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;13.10
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;9.15
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;11.01
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;9.26
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;5.01
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;0.32
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;5.09
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;2.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;4.96
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;3.23
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;11.35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;3.75
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;2.25
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;1.67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;2.21
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.42
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;10.39
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.51
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;10.72
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;12.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;7.26
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.13
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;5.35
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.88
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;4.10
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.20
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;4.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.59
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;7.58
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.82
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;6.81
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;10.98
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;10.96
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;40.91
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;40.82
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;21.67
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;100.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;21.86
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;14.94
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;15.97
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;45.17
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;40.85
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;44.70
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.74
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;28.48
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;12.67
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;4.07
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;0.44
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;22.90
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;16.44
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;22.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;22.56
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;4.07
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;20.54
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;22.62
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;20.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;16.65
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;12.37
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;16.18
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;6.54
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;5.83
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;22.43
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;19.99
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;19.60
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;20.12
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;28.29
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;27.87
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;26.44
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;61.35
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;30.25
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;23.79
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;49.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;26.56
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;37.55
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;57.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;39.70
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;10.33
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;49.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;14.56
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;14.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;53.21
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;18.52
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;3.78
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;24.74
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;6.06
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;1.47
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;8.30
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;2.22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;24.41
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;2.66
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;4.64
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;28.48
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;7.24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;34.66
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;67.45
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;38.24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;22.68
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;41.01
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;24.68
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;23.09
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;51.18
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;26.15
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;17.12
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;38.65
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;19.47
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;12.31
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;20.34
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;13.19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;1.47
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;1.31
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;5.06
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;4.50
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;7.34
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;12.37
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;7.89
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;6.76
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;12.37
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;7.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;2.79
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;4.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;2.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;13.78
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;5.86
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.74
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;4.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;5.68
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.53
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;4.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;3.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;4.64
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;4.38
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;2.61
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;2.46
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;1.96
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;1.85
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.87
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;11.73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;11.86
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;6.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;9.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;6.49
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;31.84
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;16.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;30.97
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;34.49
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;21.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;33.76
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;18.07
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;20.92
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;18.23
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.78
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;11.45
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;4.97
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;25.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;12.75
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;23.41
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;0.86
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;4.06
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;1.36
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;4.91
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;4.15
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;3.10
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;3.16
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;3.11
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;1.32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;1.12
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;4.46
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;3.77
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;13.01
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;8.09
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;12.25
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;7.63
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;3.95
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;7.06
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;18.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;5.88
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;16.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;5.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;1.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;5.16
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;26.64
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;21.82
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;25.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;43.84
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;36.40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;42.69
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;11.61
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;15.79
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;12.26
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;53.70
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;38.37
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;51.32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;24.52
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;33.66
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;25.94
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;19.27
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;40.73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;22.60
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;13.62
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;21.47
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;14.84
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;5.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;5.13
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;5.30
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;1.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;0.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;16.73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;14.58
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;16.40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;54.31
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;62.50
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;55.58
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;39.08
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;34.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;38.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;19.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;39.32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;22.91
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;12.74
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;25.20
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;14.68
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;19.69
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;26.98
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;20.82
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;1.10
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;8.09
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;2.19
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;1.10
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;5.33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;1.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;10.06
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;10.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.50
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;12.18
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;12.48
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;10.32
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;12.74
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;10.41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;2.67
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;4.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;2.75
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.53
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;9.08
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;7.59
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;4.05
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;7.47
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.21
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;3.86
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;5.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.98
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;7.68
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;6.05
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;11.18
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;12.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;11.24
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;16.49
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;21.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;16.66
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;43.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;43.34
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;43.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;19.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;20.84
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;19.22
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;18.61
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;14.35
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;18.32
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;32.63
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;25.82
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;32.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;25.14
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;15.90
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;24.50
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;2.66
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;6.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;2.89
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;9.41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;11.40
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;9.55
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;3.73
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;5.37
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;3.85
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;9.33
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;3.05
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;8.89
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;7.97
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;8.52
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;8.01
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;10.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;12.98
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;10.93
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;11.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;19.71
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;12.16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;8.34
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;5.13
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;8.12
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;22.89
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;29.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;23.36
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;26.43
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;25.88
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;26.39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;23.02
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;20.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;22.85
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;47.87
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;33.66
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;46.88
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;21.59
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;19.86
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;21.47
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;26.29
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;19.27
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;25.80
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;10.51
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;8.42
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;10.36
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;6.35
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;5.54
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;6.29
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;13.32
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;11.29
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;13.17
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;21.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;13.96
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;21.22
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;43.07
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;57.25
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;44.06
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;12.15
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;17.20
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;12.50
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;24.31
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;23.43
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;24.25
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;22.85
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;27.63
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;23.18
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;11.37
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;13.38
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;11.51
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;4.47
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;3.68
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;4.42
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;9.75
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;6.91
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;9.55
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;15.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;9.09
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;14.58
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;10.76
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;5.94
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;10.43
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.79
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;250 or more employees;10.41
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks as highly important;Total 2000;7.84
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;14.37
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;21.60
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;14.49
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;16.41
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;250 or more employees;18.32
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacle of lack of appropriate financial sources highly important;Total 2000;16.45
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.01
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;250 or more employees;3.57
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of  organisational rigidities in the company highly important;Total 2000;3.02
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Less than 250 employees;7.25
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;250 or more employees;5.96
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of qualified personnel as highly important;Total 2000;7.23
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Less than 250 employees;5.34
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;250 or more employees;1.96
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on technology highly important;Total 2000;5.29
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Less than 250 employees;3.56
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;250 or more employees;2.38
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of information on markets highly important;Total 2000;3.54
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Less than 250 employees;12.36
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;250 or more employees;8.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of insuff. flexibil. of rules and regul. highly important;Total 2000;12.30
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Less than 250 employees;8.48
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;250 or more employees;7.92
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of non EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of sensitivity of clients as highly important;Total 2000;8.47
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Less than 250 employees;14.47
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;250 or more employees;20.66
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN comp., (%) companies: to which the above-mentioned obst. have prevented innovat.;Total 2000;14.58
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Less than 250 employees;33.96
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;250 or more employees;43.35
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies that do not need to innovate due to prior innovations;Total 2000;34.12
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Less than 250 employees;19.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;250 or more employees;20.07
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in non EIN companies, (%) companies: that do not need to innovate due to market conditions;Total 2000;19.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Less than 250 employees;19.01
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;250 or more employees;13.51
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% of EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessive economic risks highly important;Total 2000;18.69
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Less than 250 employees;30.09
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;250 or more employees;21.64
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of excessively high innovation costs highly important;Total 2000;29.59
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Less than 250 employees;31.02
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;250 or more employees;20.93
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the obstacles of lack of appropriate financing sources highly important;Total 2000;30.43
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Less than 250 employees;4.03
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;250 or more employees;15.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly import.: rigidities of org. in the company;Total 2000;4.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Less than 250 employees;5.66
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;250 or more employees;5.28
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of qualified personnel;Total 2000;5.64
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Less than 250 employees;10.19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;250 or more employees;2.19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstabcles highly important: lack of info. on techn.;Total 2000;9.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Less than 250 employees;7.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;250 or more employees;6.54
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obstacles highly important: lack of market information;Total 2000;7.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Less than 250 employees;11.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;250 or more employees;17.51
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: insuff. flexib. of rules and reg.;Total 2000;11.88
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Less than 250 employees;4.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;250 or more employees;5.62
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the following obst. highly important: lack of sensitivity of the clients;Total 2000;4.89
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Less than 250 employees;15.61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;250 or more employees;12.75
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some seriously backlogged innovat. act.;Total 2000;15.44
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Less than 250 employees;4.60
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;250 or more employees;8.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN comp., (%) comp. with some innovat. act.whose beginning has been prevented;Total 2000;4.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Less than 250 employees;21.85
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;250 or more employees;22.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Consequence in EIN companies, (%) companies with some innov. activ. overburdened with other problems;Total 2000;21.90
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Less than 250 employees;30.37
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;250 or more employees;33.16
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the range of goods or services;Total 2000;30.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Less than 250 employees;17.05
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;250 or more employees;17.21
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN comp. that consider a high impact has been produced in: Increase of the market or the quota;Total 2000;17.06
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Less than 250 employees;43.87
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;250 or more employees;39.77
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in the improvement of the quality of goods/services;Total 2000;43.63
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Less than 250 employees;19.45
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;250 or more employees;30.48
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: improvement of the flexib. of production;Total 2000;20.09
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Less than 250 employees;20.61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;250 or more employees;31.62
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced in: increase in the capacity of production;Total 2000;21.25
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Less than 250 employees;11.42
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);250 or more employees;8.43
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. labour costs (unit product.);Total 2000;11.24
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Less than 250 employees;7.83
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);250 or more employees;7.41
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: reduct. material/energy (unit production);Total 2000;7.81
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Less than 250 employees;11.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;250 or more employees;20.64
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: environmental/health/security impact improvement;Total 2000;12.49
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Less than 250 employees;17.79
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;250 or more employees;26.34
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider a high impact has been produced on: fulfillment of regulat. or rules;Total 2000;18.29
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Less than 250 employees;36.14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;250 or more employees;45.58
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider the internal sources of information of the company of high importance;Total 2000;36.69
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;18.26
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;21.21
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider other companies of their same group as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;18.44
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Less than 250 employees;20.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;250 or more employees;37.92
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider suppliers of equipment/material/components as highly important sources of info;Total 2000;21.73
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Less than 250 employees;18.93
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;250 or more employees;13.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider clients as highly importantthe sources of information;Total 2000;18.63
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Less than 250 employees;14.42
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;250 or more employees;9.50
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider competitors/other companies of the same activity as highly important sources of info.;Total 2000;14.13
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;7.12
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;12.61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider University/higher education institutes as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;7.44
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;6.24
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;11.28
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Public R+D organsiations/technological centres as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;6.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Less than 250 employees;17.99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;250 or more employees;21.95
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider Congresses, meetings and professional magazines as highly important sources of information;Total 2000;18.22
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Less than 250 employees;11.82
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;250 or more employees;16.16
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;% EIN companies that consider fairs, expositions as highly important sources of information:;Total 2000;12.07