Economic activity;Method employed to protect innovations or inventions;Size of the company;Total
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;3,900
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;306
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;4,206
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;2,651
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;251
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;2,902
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;1,250
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;54
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;1,304
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;2.69
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;10.33
TOTAL COMPANIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;2.84
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;5,591
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;407
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;5,998
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;3,492
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;317
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;3,809
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;2,099
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;90
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;2,189
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;3.86
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;13.77
TOTAL COMPANIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;4.06
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;10,099
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;2,817
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;12,916
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;7,319
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;2,677
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;9,996
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;2,781
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;140
TOTAL COMPANIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;2,920
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;22,581
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;7,551
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;30,132
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;15,541
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;7,177
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;22,718
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;7,040
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;373
TOTAL COMPANIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;7,414
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;4,349
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;292
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;4,641
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;5,854
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;364
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;6,218
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;1,270
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;122
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;1,391
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;5,673
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;409
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;6,082
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;5,585
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;415
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;6,000
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;6,409
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;455
TOTAL COMPANIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;6,864
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.85
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;12.59
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;10.94
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;22
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;22
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;22
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.62
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;5.68
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;3.73
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13.11
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;24.31
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;13.72
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;18
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13.83
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;20.65
TOTAL COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;14.20
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;8
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;9
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;7
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;1.04
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;4.23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;1.13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;9
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;11
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;8
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;3
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;1.10
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;8.45
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;1.32
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;20
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;33
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;28
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;5
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;5
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;29
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;110
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;139
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;23
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;110
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;133
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;6
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;15
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;1
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;16
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;5
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;21
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;10
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;13
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;9
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;2
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;12
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16.62
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;14.74
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;17
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;18
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;26.55
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;23.55
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;40
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;12
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8.12
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;40.00
1. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PETROLEUM;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;11.72
1.1 Extractive industries;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;8
1.1 Extractive industries;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;8
1.1 Extractive industries;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
1.1 Extractive industries;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;6
1.1 Extractive industries;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;2
1.1 Extractive industries;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;2
1.1 Extractive industries;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;1.05
1.1 Extractive industries;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;0.00
1.1 Extractive industries;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;1.03
1.1 Extractive industries;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;9
1.1 Extractive industries;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;9
1.1 Extractive industries;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
1.1 Extractive industries;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;6
1.1 Extractive industries;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
1.1 Extractive industries;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;3
1.1 Extractive industries;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;1.11
1.1 Extractive industries;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;0.00
1.1 Extractive industries;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;1.09
1.1 Extractive industries;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;20
1.1 Extractive industries;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;20
1.1 Extractive industries;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;15
1.1 Extractive industries;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;15
1.1 Extractive industries;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;5
1.1 Extractive industries;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;5
1.1 Extractive industries;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;29
1.1 Extractive industries;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;29
1.1 Extractive industries;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;23
1.1 Extractive industries;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;23
1.1 Extractive industries;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;6
1.1 Extractive industries;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;6
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;13
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;13
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;15
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;15
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;0
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;13
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;2
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;16
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;10
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;1
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;12
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;9
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;1
1.1 Extractive industries;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;11
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17.57
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;16.68
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;18
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;25.78
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;24.46
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;57
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;11
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8.59
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;57.14
1.1 Extractive industries;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;11.07
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;14.29
1.2 Petroleum industries;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;6.25
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;2
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;2
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;28.57
1.2 Petroleum industries;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;12.50
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;13
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;13
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;13
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;13
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;110
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;110
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;110
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;110
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;2
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;3
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;3
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;3
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;5
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;1
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;29
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;17
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;40.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;16.67
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;29
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;17
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;28.57
1.2 Petroleum industries;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;16.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;313
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;13
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;326
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;236
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;246
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;77
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;4
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;80
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;5.06
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;8.10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;5.14
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;397
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;24
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;420
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;263
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;18
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;281
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;134
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;6
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;139
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;6.42
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;14.23
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;6.62
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;705
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;104
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;809
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;380
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;94
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;474
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;325
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;10
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;335
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;1,851
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;493
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2,343
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;1,393
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;471
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,864
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;458
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;22
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;479
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;382
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;23
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;405
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;861
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;37
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;897
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;65
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;5
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;70
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;594
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;41
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;635
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;411
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;39
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;449
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;444
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;44
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;488
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11.31
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;18.32
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;11.67
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;40
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;36
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;40
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;2.02
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;1.92
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.05
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;29.63
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;15.81
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;15
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;6
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.97
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;36.27
2. FOOD, BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;12.29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;160
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;169
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;105
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;7
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;112
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;55
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;57
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;2.31
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;14.06
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;2.42
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;277
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;13
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;290
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;203
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;212
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;75
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;4
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;4.00
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;20.31
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;4.15
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;312
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;37
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;349
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;233
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;28
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;261
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;88
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;690
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;286
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;976
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;456
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;267
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;723
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;234
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;19
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;253
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;228
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;9
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;237
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;692
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;16
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;708
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;78
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;2
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;80
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;538
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;19
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;557
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;548
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;20
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;568
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;457
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;16
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;473
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9.96
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;7.79
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;9.89
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;29
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.12
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;2.60
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.20
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16.69
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;35.06
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;17.27
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;17
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13.02
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;15.58
3. TEXTILES, CLOTHING, LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;13.10
3.1 TEXTILES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;115
3.1 TEXTILES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;5
3.1 TEXTILES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;120
3.1 TEXTILES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;72
3.1 TEXTILES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;4
3.1 TEXTILES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;76
3.1 TEXTILES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;44
3.1 TEXTILES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
3.1 TEXTILES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;45
3.1 TEXTILES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;5.29
3.1 TEXTILES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;15.15
3.1 TEXTILES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;5.44
3.1 TEXTILES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;117
3.1 TEXTILES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;8
3.1 TEXTILES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;125
3.1 TEXTILES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;95
3.1 TEXTILES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;6
3.1 TEXTILES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;101
3.1 TEXTILES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;22
3.1 TEXTILES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
3.1 TEXTILES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;24
3.1 TEXTILES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;5.37
3.1 TEXTILES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;24.24
3.1 TEXTILES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;5.65
3.1 TEXTILES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;206
3.1 TEXTILES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;20
3.1 TEXTILES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;226
3.1 TEXTILES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;144
3.1 TEXTILES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;17
3.1 TEXTILES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;161
3.1 TEXTILES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;62
3.1 TEXTILES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;3
3.1 TEXTILES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;65
3.1 TEXTILES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;226
3.1 TEXTILES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;270
3.1 TEXTILES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;496
3.1 TEXTILES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;158
3.1 TEXTILES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;260
3.1 TEXTILES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;418
3.1 TEXTILES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;69
3.1 TEXTILES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;10
3.1 TEXTILES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;79
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;68
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;6
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;74
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;229
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;9
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;238
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;20
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;1
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;21
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;228
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;16
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;244
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;204
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;16
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;220
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;190
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;15
3.1 TEXTILES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;205
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5.31
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;8.70
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;5.47
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;22
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;19
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17.09
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;52.17
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;18.66
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;17
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;13
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;12.52
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;26.09
3.1 TEXTILES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;13.13
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;28
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;4
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;32
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;22
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;25
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;0.92
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;16.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;1.04
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;113
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;5
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;118
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;78
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;81
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;35
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;37
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;3.73
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;20.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;3.86
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;37
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;17
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;54
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;25
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;11
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;36
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;12
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;6
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;18
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;198
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;16
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;214
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;87
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;94
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;111
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;9
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;120
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;104
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;3
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;107
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;201
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;208
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;19
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;20
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;218
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;219
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;240
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;2
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;242
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;188
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;1
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;189
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19.80
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;7.14
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;19.37
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;23
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;43
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;24
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;7.14
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.24
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;25.65
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;24.77
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;12
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;7
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;12
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;20.15
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
3.2 CLOTHING AND FURS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;19.47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;17
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;17
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;12
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;0.98
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;0.98
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;30
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;30
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;18
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;18
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;2.75
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;2.74
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;69
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;69
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;65
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;65
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;5
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;266
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;266
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;211
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;211
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;57
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;57
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;263
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;263
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;39
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;39
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;92
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;2
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;94
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;105
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;2
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;106
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;80
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;80
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4.48
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;4.46
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;54
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.47
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.46
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4.02
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;100.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;4.50
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;1
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;100
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;2
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4.32
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
3.3 LEATHER AND FOOTWEAR;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;4.28
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;309
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;16
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;325
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;187
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;13
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;200
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;123
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;3
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;126
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;5.33
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;13.87
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;5.49
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;365
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;22
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;387
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;210
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;227
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;155
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;5
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;160
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;6.27
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;19.41
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;6.53
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;675
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;77
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;752
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;407
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;64
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;471
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;268
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;13
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;281
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;1,645
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;237
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;1,882
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;758
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;178
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;935
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;887
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;59
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;946
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;269
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;286
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;332
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;23
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;355
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;135
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;9
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;144
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;342
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;17
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;359
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;323
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;12
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;335
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;381
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;14
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;395
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.36
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;4.82
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;14.92
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;18
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;20
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5.68
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;13.88
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;6.02
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.67
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;19.27
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;15.82
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;10
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;7
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16.50
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;7.23
4. WOOD, PAPER, PUBLISHING, GRAPHIC ARTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;16.12
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;97
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;4
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;101
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;68
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;71
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;29
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;30
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;4.27
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;9.27
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;4.36
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;128
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;4
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;132
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;67
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;70
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;61
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;62
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;5.64
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;9.27
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;5.71
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;109
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;8
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;117
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;70
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;6
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;76
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;39
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;2
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;41
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;186
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;13
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;199
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;98
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;10
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;108
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;88
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;91
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;43
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;4
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;47
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;61
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;66
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;5
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;1
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;6
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;128
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;131
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;135
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;2
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;137
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;128
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;3
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;131
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9.09
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;16.67
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;9.26
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;17
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;7
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;1.78
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;1.74
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24.20
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;16.67
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;24.03
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;0
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;8
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.71
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
4.1 WOOD AND CORK;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;15.36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;115
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;125
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;24
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;8
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;32
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;91
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;93
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;13.55
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;32.26
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;14.21
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;79
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;12
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;91
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;27
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;9
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;52
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;3
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;55
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;9.32
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;38.71
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;10.35
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;272
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;49
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;321
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;52
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;38
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;90
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;220
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;11
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;231
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;893
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;98
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;991
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;170
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;43
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;213
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;723
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;55
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;778
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;105
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;115
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;114
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;8
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;122
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;54
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;64
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;9
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;45
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;36
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;10
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;46
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;38.96
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;5.26
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;36.15
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;39
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;11
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;37
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17.71
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;31.58
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;18.87
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;16
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;1
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;1.41
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;10.53
4.2 CARDBOARD AND PAPER;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;2.17
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;98
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;2
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;100
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;95
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;97
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;3
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;3.62
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;4.86
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;3.64
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;158
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;6
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;164
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;116
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;5
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;121
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;42
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;43
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;5.85
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;15.51
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;5.99
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;295
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;20
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;315
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;286
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;20
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;306
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;566
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;126
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;692
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;490
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;125
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;615
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;76
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;77
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;121
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;3
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;124
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;158
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;10
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;168
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;130
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;8
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;138
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;160
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;4
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;164
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;152
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;153
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;217
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;1
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;218
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8.65
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;8.37
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;26
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;19
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.19
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;34.89
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;10.99
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.24
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;6.06
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;10.10
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;6
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;9
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;23.36
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;6.06
4.3 PUBLISHING, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;22.79
5. CHEMISTRY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;152
5. CHEMISTRY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;31
5. CHEMISTRY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;183
5. CHEMISTRY;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;122
5. CHEMISTRY;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;31
5. CHEMISTRY;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;153
5. CHEMISTRY;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;30
5. CHEMISTRY;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
5. CHEMISTRY;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;30
5. CHEMISTRY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;10.51
5. CHEMISTRY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;24.45
5. CHEMISTRY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;11.63
5. CHEMISTRY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;241
5. CHEMISTRY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;48
5. CHEMISTRY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;289
5. CHEMISTRY;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;165
5. CHEMISTRY;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;45
5. CHEMISTRY;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;210
5. CHEMISTRY;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;75
5. CHEMISTRY;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;3
5. CHEMISTRY;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;79
5. CHEMISTRY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;16.61
5. CHEMISTRY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;38.22
5. CHEMISTRY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;18.35
5. CHEMISTRY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;677
5. CHEMISTRY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;535
5. CHEMISTRY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;1,212
5. CHEMISTRY;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;580
5. CHEMISTRY;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;535
5. CHEMISTRY;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,116
5. CHEMISTRY;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;96
5. CHEMISTRY;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
5. CHEMISTRY;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;96
5. CHEMISTRY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;1,789
5. CHEMISTRY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;711
5. CHEMISTRY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2,499
5. CHEMISTRY;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;864
5. CHEMISTRY;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;700
5. CHEMISTRY;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,564
5. CHEMISTRY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;924
5. CHEMISTRY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;11
5. CHEMISTRY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;935
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;131
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;32
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;162
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;259
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;50
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;309
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;35
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;13
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;48
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;336
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;55
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;391
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;260
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;45
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;306
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;307
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;46
5. CHEMISTRY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;354
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4.13
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;12.99
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;5.29
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;27
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;31
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;27
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;38.45
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;40.96
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;38.77
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;23
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;17
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;20.56
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;23.30
5. CHEMISTRY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;20.92
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;106
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;14
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;120
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;96
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;14
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;110
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;8.54
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;19.37
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;9.15
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;178
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;21
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;199
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;126
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;20
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;145
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;52
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;54
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;14.38
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;28.02
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;15.15
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;498
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;459
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;956
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;488
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;459
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;946
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;10
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;1,275
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;375
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;1,650
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;531
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;372
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;903
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;745
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;3
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;747
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;101
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;16
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;117
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;194
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;30
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;223
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;31
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;4
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;34
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;267
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;37
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;304
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;230
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;31
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;261
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;269
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;35
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;304
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;2.92
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;10.68
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;3.73
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;22
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;21
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;22
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;38.04
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;49.16
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;39.20
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;19
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;17
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;23.30
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;26.26
5.1 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;23.61
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;46
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;16
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;63
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;27
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;16
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;43
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;20
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;20
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;22.26
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;31.73
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;24.14
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;62
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;27
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;90
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;39
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;25
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;65
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;23
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;25
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;29.90
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;52.86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;34.47
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;179
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;77
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;256
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;93
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;77
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;169
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;513
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;336
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;849
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;334
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;328
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;662
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;179
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;8
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;187
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;29
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;15
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;65
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;21
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;86
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;4
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;9
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;14
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;69
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;18
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;87
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;30
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;14
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;44
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;38
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;12
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;50
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8.60
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;16.57
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;10.32
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;47
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;39.94
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;28.22
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;37.41
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;28
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;19
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.45
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;18.70
5.2 PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;12.24
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;203
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;217
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;163
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;177
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;10.56
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;25.23
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;10.97
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;314
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;18
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;333
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;223
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;17
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;240
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;91
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;92
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;16.31
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;33.38
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;16.79
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;736
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;59
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;796
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;643
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;59
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;703
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;93
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;93
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;2,123
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;236
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2,359
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;1,552
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;225
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,777
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;571
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;581
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;258
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;270
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;155
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;8
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;163
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;22
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;261
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;20
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;281
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;239
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;21
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;260
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;262
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;13
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;275
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;21.60
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;4.44
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;20.78
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;4
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;14
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.42
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.40
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13.54
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;48.64
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;15.24
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;36
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;12
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;20.45
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;4.44
6. RUBBER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;19.67
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;165
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;177
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;114
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;9
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;123
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;51
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;53
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;5.04
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;15.58
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;5.28
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;164
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;179
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;108
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;13
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;121
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;56
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;59
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;5.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;20.96
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;5.35
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;293
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;47
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;339
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;225
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;43
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;268
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;68
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;3
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;71
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;716
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;90
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;806
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;632
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;697
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;84
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;109
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;124
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;136
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;199
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;215
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;14
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;3
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;16
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;264
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;290
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;189
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;20
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;209
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;227
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;25
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;252
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9.61
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;13.50
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;9.87
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;24
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;12
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.20
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.19
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;20.65
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;41.08
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;22.02
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;23
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;18
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7.33
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;37.50
7. VARIOUS NON-METALLIC ORE PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;9.35
8. METALLURGY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;29
8. METALLURGY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;6
8. METALLURGY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;36
8. METALLURGY;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;22
8. METALLURGY;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;6
8. METALLURGY;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;29
8. METALLURGY;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;7
8. METALLURGY;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
8. METALLURGY;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;7
8. METALLURGY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;4.37
8. METALLURGY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;12.95
8. METALLURGY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;4.97
8. METALLURGY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;77
8. METALLURGY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;10
8. METALLURGY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;86
8. METALLURGY;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;34
8. METALLURGY;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;10
8. METALLURGY;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;44
8. METALLURGY;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;42
8. METALLURGY;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
8. METALLURGY;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;42
8. METALLURGY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;11.50
8. METALLURGY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;19.62
8. METALLURGY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;12.07
8. METALLURGY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;86
8. METALLURGY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;10
8. METALLURGY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;96
8. METALLURGY;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;70
8. METALLURGY;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;10
8. METALLURGY;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;81
8. METALLURGY;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;16
8. METALLURGY;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
8. METALLURGY;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;16
8. METALLURGY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;177
8. METALLURGY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;52
8. METALLURGY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;229
8. METALLURGY;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;71
8. METALLURGY;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;52
8. METALLURGY;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;123
8. METALLURGY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;106
8. METALLURGY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
8. METALLURGY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;106
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;37
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;3
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;40
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;94
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;100
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;26
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;26
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;97
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;17
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;114
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;92
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;15
8. METALLURGY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;107
8. METALLURGY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;105
8. METALLURGY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;15
8. METALLURGY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;120
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;6.60
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;5.03
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;6.41
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;10
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;15
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.14
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;2.76
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24.20
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;39.88
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;26.08
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;29
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;11
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14.01
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;10.80
8. METALLURGY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;13.62
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;21
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;25
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;16
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;19
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;5.05
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;9.44
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;5.40
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;53
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;7
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;59
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;20
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;7
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;26
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;33
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;33
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;12.62
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;18.51
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;13.09
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;37
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;40
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;31
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;35
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;111
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;9
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;120
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;34
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;9
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;43
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;78
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;78
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;29
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;3
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;32
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;77
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;82
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;21
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;21
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;62
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;10
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;72
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;64
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;8
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;71
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;70
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;8
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;77
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;2.26
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;7.96
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;2.89
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;16
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;13
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13.06
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;21.95
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;14.04
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;8
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;6
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5.30
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
8.1 FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;4.71
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;8
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;11
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;9
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;2
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;2
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;3.24
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;22.69
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;4.22
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;24
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;27
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;15
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;9
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;9
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;9.63
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;22.69
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;10.29
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;49
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;56
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;39
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;46
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;10
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;10
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;66
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;43
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;109
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;37
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;43
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;80
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;28
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;28
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;8
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;8
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;5
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;5
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;34
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;42
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;29
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;36
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;35
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;7
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;42
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16.42
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;14.11
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;22
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;19
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.22
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;8.78
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;49.37
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;70.67
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;52.37
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;64
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;24
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;33.69
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;29.33
8.2 NON-FERROUS METALLURGY PRODUCTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;33.07
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;439
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;9
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;448
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;293
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;9
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;302
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;146
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;146
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;6.65
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;15.31
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;6.73
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;622
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;636
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;369
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;12
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;381
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;252
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;255
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;9.43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;23.18
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;9.55
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;1,093
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;1,136
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;717
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;760
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;376
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;376
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;2,662
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;228
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2,890
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;1,729
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;180
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,909
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;932
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;49
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;981
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;413
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;13
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;425
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;359
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;7
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;366
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;40
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;3
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;43
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;474
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;23
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;497
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;379
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;393
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;469
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;20
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;489
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18.78
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;19.14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;18.79
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;19
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;2.13
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;3.78
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;2.17
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.88
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;28.72
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;11.33
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;14
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;6
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18.26
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;27.71
9. METALLIC MANUFACTURES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;18.50
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;663
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;754
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;566
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;90
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;655
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;97
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;99
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;9.69
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;30.80
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;10.57
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;1,110
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;109
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;1,219
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;863
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;102
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;965
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;247
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;7
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;254
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;16.23
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;36.86
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;17.08
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;1,793
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;1,299
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;3,092
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;1,670
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;1,277
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;2,947
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;123
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;22
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;145
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;5,063
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;3,403
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;8,466
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;4,379
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;3,352
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;7,731
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;683
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;52
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;735
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;753
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;78
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;832
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;827
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;75
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;901
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;42
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;17
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;58
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;883
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;91
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;974
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;1,006
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;97
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;1,103
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;1,040
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;1,129
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.08
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;21.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;15.59
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;20
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;24
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.89
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;2.85
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;1.03
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;12.66
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;23.93
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;13.50
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;22
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.14
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;21.04
10. MACHINERY, TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;15.59
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;322
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;17
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;339
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;286
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;16
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;302
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;36
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;37
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;9.35
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;26.87
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;9.67
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;624
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;23
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;647
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;480
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;21
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;500
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;144
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;3
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;147
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;18.15
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;37.03
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;18.49
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;883
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;109
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;992
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;840
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;87
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;927
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;43
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;22
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;65
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;2,893
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;359
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;3,252
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;2,551
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;310
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;2,861
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;343
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;48
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;391
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;457
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;18
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;475
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;472
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;16
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;488
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;10
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;2
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;12
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;394
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;16
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;410
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;510
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;18
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;528
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;537
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;14
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;551
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17.50
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;32.49
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;18.02
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;27
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;18
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;27
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7.11
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;13.71
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;7.34
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;28
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11.57
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;13.71
10.1 MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;11.64
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;6
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;6
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;11.07
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;9
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;9
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;16.73
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;91
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;91
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;143
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;143
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;0
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;7
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;13
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;6
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;15
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;13
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;15
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;9.03
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;39
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;9.03
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;25.00
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;19
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.2 OFFICE, CALCULATION AND COMPUTER MACHINES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;29.17
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;112
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;26
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;139
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;75
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;26
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;101
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;37
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;37
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;9.97
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;42.24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;11.65
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;174
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;31
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;205
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;122
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;28
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;150
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;51
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;3
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;55
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;15.43
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;50.18
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;17.24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;342
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;574
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;916
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;292
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;574
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;865
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;51
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;51
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;645
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;1,508
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2,153
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;522
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;1,505
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;2,027
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;123
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;3
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;126
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;85
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;23
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;108
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;104
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;21
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;125
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;7
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;5
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;12
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;163
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;23
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;185
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;143
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;167
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;120
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;24
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;144
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5.40
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;22.45
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;7.36
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;25
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;31
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;26
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;3.30
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.38
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.75
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;29.30
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;12.88
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;17
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;12
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;13.29
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;18.89
10.3 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;13.93
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;40
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;49
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;40
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;49
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;11.63
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;32.55
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;13.23
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;52
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;61
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;49
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;58
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;3
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;15.17
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;34.12
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;16.63
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;96
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;182
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;277
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;96
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;182
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;277
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;258
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;109
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;368
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;253
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;109
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;362
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;6
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;6
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;60
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;7
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;67
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;64
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;73
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;8
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;2
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;81
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;91
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;88
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;11
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;99
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;74
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;9
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;83
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17.06
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;21.25
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;17.50
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;26
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;12
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;2.08
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;1.86
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;29.73
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;37.73
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;30.56
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;30
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;30
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;30
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;29.81
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;44.32
10.4 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;31.33
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;12
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;15
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;15
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;6.24
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;23.08
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;7.35
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;20
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;2
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;22
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;17
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;10.89
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;15.38
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;11.18
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;64
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;83
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;64
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;83
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;92
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;120
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;86
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;114
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;6
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;6
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;25
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;3
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;23
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;4
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;1
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;5
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;37
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;5
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;42
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;44
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;6
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;49
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;29
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;4
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;33
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;25.29
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;15.38
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;24.18
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;46
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;22
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5.28
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;4.68
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;45.53
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;53.85
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;46.46
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;29
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;54
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;32
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;28.09
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;53.85
10.4.1 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;30.99
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;28
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;34
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;28
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;34
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;18.06
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;40.58
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;20.09
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;32
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;8
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;39
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;32
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;8
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;39
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;20.30
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;50.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;22.97
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;77
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;118
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;195
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;77
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;118
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;195
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;167
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;81
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;248
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;167
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;81
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;248
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;0
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;35
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;4
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;39
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;41
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;4
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;45
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;4
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;1
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;5
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;43
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;49
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;44
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;50
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;44
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;6
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;50
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11.72
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;25.64
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;13.10
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;12
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;5
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19.46
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;25.64
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;20.08
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;31
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;12
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;29
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;30.93
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;37.18
10.4.2 RADIO, TV AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;31.55
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;105
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;7
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;112
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;91
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;7
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;98
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;19.51
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;40.17
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;20.17
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;110
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;8
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;118
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;97
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;8
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;105
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;20.61
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;43.02
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;21.32
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;283
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;67
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;350
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;270
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;67
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;337
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;13
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;800
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;127
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;927
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;696
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;127
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;823
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;104
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;104
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;61
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;6
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;67
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;81
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;85
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;12
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;12
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;76
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;4
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;80
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;82
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;6
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;88
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;93
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;7
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;100
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16.42
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;11.70
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;16.23
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;18
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;24
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;6.08
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;5.83
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18.98
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;23.97
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;19.19
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;36
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;15
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.02
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;17.55
10.5 OPTICAL AND TIME-KEEPING INSTRUMENTS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;15.12
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;64
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;27
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;91
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;56
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;27
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;83
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;8
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;8
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;8.31
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;27.88
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;10.48
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;99
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;32
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;131
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;80
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;30
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;111
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;19
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;20
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;12.81
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;32.73
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;15.01
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;121
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;261
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;382
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;107
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;261
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;368
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;13
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;13
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;272
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;1,113
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;1,385
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;215
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;1,113
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,328
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;57
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;57
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;66
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;16
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;83
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;72
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;16
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;88
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;3
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;3
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;130
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;28
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;158
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;132
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;29
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;161
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;161
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;28
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;189
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15.61
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;17.53
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;15.94
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;11
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;17
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;2.60
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.44
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;22.97
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;23.34
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;23.04
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;27
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;19
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;26
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24.15
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;26.99
10.6 MOTOR VEHICLES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;24.63
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;15
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;19
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;3
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;2.71
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;14.81
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;3.26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;42
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;5
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;47
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;5
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;31
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;7.45
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;18.52
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;7.95
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;58
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;84
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;55
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;81
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;151
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;87
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;238
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;100
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;87
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;187
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;51
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;51
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;18
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;7
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;24
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;22
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;8
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;30
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;4
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;9
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;35
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;9
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;48
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;41
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;7
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;48
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11.94
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;16.39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;12.56
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;21
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;25
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;21
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;16.39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;2.26
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.47
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;16.39
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;11.29
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;16
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.65
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.7 OTHER TRANSPORT MATERIAL;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;9.18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;7
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;8
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;7
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;1.69
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;7.58
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;1.87
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;17
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;12
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;4.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;7.58
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;4.11
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;33
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;34
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;30
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;31
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;2
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;2
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;52
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;53
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;10
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;11
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;42
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;42
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;1
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;7
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;11
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;2
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;13
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;6
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;3
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;9
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;3
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;21
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;18
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;3
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;21
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14.57
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;13.59
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;28
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;26
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;67
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;5
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.7.1 NAVAL CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;2
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;2
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;5.56
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;4
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;4
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;11.11
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;10
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;9
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;1
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;37
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;36
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;1
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;3
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;2
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;1
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;8
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;8
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;9
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;10.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;10
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;10.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;60.00
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;30
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;..
10.7.2 MANUFACTURE OF AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;30.00
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;9
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;2
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;6.47
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;22.73
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;7.66
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;22
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;25
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;21
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;4
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;4
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;20.06
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;34.09
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;21.09
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;23
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;41
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;23
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;41
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;91
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;56
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;147
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;84
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;56
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;140
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;7
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;9
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;14
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;10
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;14
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;13
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;14
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;5
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;19
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;15
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;3
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11.45
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;13.89
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;11.96
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;28
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;18
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;13.89
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;2.93
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7.43
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;27.78
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;11.73
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;0
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;13
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19.07
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
10.7.3 OTHER TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;15.05
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;277
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;8
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;285
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;224
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;7
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;231
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;53
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;7.30
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;28.77
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;7.46
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;397
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;12
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;409
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;283
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;9
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;293
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;113
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;3
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;116
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;10.45
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;41.41
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;10.68
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;868
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;83
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;951
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;686
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;82
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;768
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;182
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;1
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;183
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;1,904
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;156
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2,060
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;1,525
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;150
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,675
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;379
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;6
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;385
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;410
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;11
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;421
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;372
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;13
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;385
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;176
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;5
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;180
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;521
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;9
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;529
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;488
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;497
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;532
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;7
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;539
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18.34
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;29.80
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;18.54
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;42
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;15
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.63
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;17.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;3.87
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19.07
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;22.78
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;19.14
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;16
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16.50
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;17.39
11. MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;16.51
11.1 FURNITURE;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;176
11.1 FURNITURE;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;6
11.1 FURNITURE;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;182
11.1 FURNITURE;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;156
11.1 FURNITURE;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;5
11.1 FURNITURE;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;161
11.1 FURNITURE;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;19
11.1 FURNITURE;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
11.1 FURNITURE;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;21
11.1 FURNITURE;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;5.82
11.1 FURNITURE;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;29.94
11.1 FURNITURE;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;5.98
11.1 FURNITURE;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;232
11.1 FURNITURE;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;7
11.1 FURNITURE;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;239
11.1 FURNITURE;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;177
11.1 FURNITURE;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;6
11.1 FURNITURE;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;183
11.1 FURNITURE;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;55
11.1 FURNITURE;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
11.1 FURNITURE;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;56
11.1 FURNITURE;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;7.67
11.1 FURNITURE;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;35.03
11.1 FURNITURE;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;7.85
11.1 FURNITURE;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;438
11.1 FURNITURE;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;22
11.1 FURNITURE;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;461
11.1 FURNITURE;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;364
11.1 FURNITURE;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;21
11.1 FURNITURE;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;385
11.1 FURNITURE;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;74
11.1 FURNITURE;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;1
11.1 FURNITURE;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;75
11.1 FURNITURE;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;1,031
11.1 FURNITURE;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;73
11.1 FURNITURE;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;1,104
11.1 FURNITURE;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;842
11.1 FURNITURE;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;71
11.1 FURNITURE;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;914
11.1 FURNITURE;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;189
11.1 FURNITURE;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;1
11.1 FURNITURE;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;190
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;264
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;8
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;272
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;252
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;8
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;260
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;98
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;2
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;100
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;412
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;6
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;419
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;388
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;7
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;396
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;440
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;4
11.1 FURNITURE;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;444
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14.17
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;26.13
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;14.36
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;44
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;10
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.47
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;18.02
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.75
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;19.44
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;26.13
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;19.55
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;16
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18.39
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;18.02
11.1 FURNITURE;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;18.38
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;101
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;104
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;67
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;70
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;34
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;34
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;13.04
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;26.14
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;13.19
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;165
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;5
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;170
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;106
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;4
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;110
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;59
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;1
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;60
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;21.27
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;55.68
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;21.65
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;429
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;61
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;491
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;322
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;61
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;383
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;108
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;108
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;872
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;84
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;956
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;683
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;78
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;761
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;190
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;5
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;195
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;145
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;4
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;149
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;120
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;125
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;78
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;80
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;109
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;111
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;99
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;102
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;92
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;2
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;95
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;30.57
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;37.10
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;30.73
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;30
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;37
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;30
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;12.90
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;16.13
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;12.97
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17.98
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;16.13
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;17.94
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;16
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10.95
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;16.13
11.2 OTHER MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;11.07
12. RECYCLING;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;0.00
12. RECYCLING;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2
12. RECYCLING;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;2
12. RECYCLING;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;3.14
12. RECYCLING;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2
12. RECYCLING;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;2
12. RECYCLING;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;7
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;6
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;6
12. RECYCLING;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;6
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;28
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;44.00
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;0
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;..
12. RECYCLING;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;72.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;5
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;7
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;12
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;6
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;9
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;1
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;1.25
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;17.13
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;2.84
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;14
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;10
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;23
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;8
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;20
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;1
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;3.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;23.28
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;5.62
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;11
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;20
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;31
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;8
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;10
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;18
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;10
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;13
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;22
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;46
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;68
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;21
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;36
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;56
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;1
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;10
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;11
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;6
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;9
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;12
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;5
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;17
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;2
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;2
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;2
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;4
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;6
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;12
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;3
13. ENERGY AND WATER;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;15
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9.28
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;43.65
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;21.82
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;44
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;22
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7.50
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;15.24
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;10.32
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;15
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;6
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;15.24
13. ENERGY AND WATER;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;5.56
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;166
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;11
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;177
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;147
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;9
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;156
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;19
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;2
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;20
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;0.59
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;5.02
14. CONSTRUCTION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;0.62
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;248
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;16
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;264
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;147
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;11
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;158
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;101
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;5
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;106
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;0.88
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;7.48
14. CONSTRUCTION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;0.93
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;257
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;25
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;282
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;220
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;24
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;244
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;37
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;2
14. CONSTRUCTION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;39
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;592
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;160
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;752
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;491
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;148
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;639
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;101
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;12
14. CONSTRUCTION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;113
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;176
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;8
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;184
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;56
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;10
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;66
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;30
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;7
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;37
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;214
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;19
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;233
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;243
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;25
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;268
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;415
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;26
14. CONSTRUCTION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;440
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;10.03
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;0.45
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;10
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;4
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.94
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;2.89
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;3.90
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;15.81
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;0.72
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;10
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;19
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;10
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14.00
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;32.40
14. CONSTRUCTION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;14.84
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;605
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;24
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;630
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;225
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;228
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;380
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;21
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;401
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;1.50
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;4.81
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;1.54
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;907
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;35
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;942
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;361
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;6
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;367
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;547
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;29
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;575
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;2.25
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;6.91
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;2.31
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;1,668
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;244
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;1,912
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;856
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;197
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,054
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;812
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;46
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;858
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;2,107
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;443
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;2,550
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;844
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;406
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,249
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;1,264
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;37
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;1,301
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;671
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;29
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;700
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;1,144
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;30
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;1,175
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;259
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;10
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;269
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;414
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;15
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;429
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;473
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;21
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;494
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;829
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;27
15. TRADE AND CATERING;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;856
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7.10
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;9.11
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;7.16
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;28
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;30
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;29
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5.58
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;6.64
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;5.61
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4.57
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;9.89
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;4.73
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;10
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;4
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;6.02
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;13.02
15. TRADE AND CATERING;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;6.22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;2
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;35
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;7
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;0.50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;1.53
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;0.52
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;36
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;8
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;0.50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;2.30
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;0.54
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;12
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;45
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;12
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;50
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;17
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;22
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;28
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;43
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;46
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;62
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;4
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;67
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;33
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;3
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;36
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;56
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;9
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;64
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;103
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;9
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;112
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;105
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;18
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;122
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;6.25
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;10.74
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;6.79
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;6
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;6
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;6
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;4.60
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.56
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9.10
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;14.05
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;9.69
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;32
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;5
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;29
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5.40
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
16. TRANSPORT, STORAGE;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;4.75
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;2.81
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;2.72
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;2.81
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;2.72
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;9
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;9
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;51
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;51
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;32
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;32
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;19
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;7
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;2
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;9
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;6
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;6
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;4
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;1
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;5
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;18
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;6
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;8
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;30
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;3
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7.40
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;6.28
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;9.92
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;1.50
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;10
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;22
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;23.82
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;59.92
17. POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;29.26
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;3.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;2.95
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;3.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;2.95
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;19
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;1
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;1
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;2
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;5
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;0
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17.1 POSTAL AND COURRIER ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;2.22
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;2.06
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;2.22
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;2.06
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;9
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;32
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;6
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;2
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;8
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;4
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;4
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;4
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;1
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;5
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;18
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;6
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;24
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;21
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;8
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;29
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;2
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;12.02
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;9.33
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;9.92
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;2.22
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;39
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;10
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;33
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;38.68
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;59.92
17.2 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;43.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;2.56
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;0.27
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;4
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;7
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;4
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;7
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;0.39
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;2.56
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;0.62
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;2
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;2
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;32
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;33
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;12
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;44
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;55
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;12
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;44
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;55
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;5
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;8
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;38
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;13
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;51
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;9
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;4
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;14
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;40
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;5
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;45
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;73
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;9
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;82
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;83
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;17
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;101
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;5.57
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;0.89
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;15
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;21
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;16
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0.00
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;10.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;1.63
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.59
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;10.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;4.65
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;0
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;19
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;3
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7.18
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;24.43
18. FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;9.95
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;212
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;31
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;243
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;200
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;28
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;228
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;4
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;16
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;1.45
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;4.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;1.59
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;236
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;34
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;270
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;180
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;27
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;207
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;56
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;7
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;63
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;1.62
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;5.12
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;1.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;614
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;150
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;764
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;573
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;146
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;719
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;4
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;45
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;783
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;782
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;1,565
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;665
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;773
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;1,438
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;118
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;9
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;127
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;271
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;26
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;297
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;271
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;310
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;188
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;26
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;214
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;556
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;31
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;586
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;648
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;687
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;604
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;52
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;655
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.77
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;3.23
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;3.73
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;15
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;10
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8.62
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;14.00
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;8.97
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;17.41
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;20.39
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;17.60
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;20
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;19
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;19
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24.13
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;17.96
19. REAL ESTATE, COMPANY SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;23.73
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;107
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;119
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;101
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;113
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;8.34
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;16.34
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;8.79
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;100
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;16
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;115
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;87
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;16
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;103
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;7.80
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;20.51
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;8.51
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;245
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;44
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;289
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;239
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;44
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;282
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;6
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;213
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;274
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;488
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;201
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;274
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;475
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;55
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;11
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;66
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;131
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;17
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;149
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;90
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;13
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;104
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;217
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;10
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;228
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;221
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;13
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;235
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;197
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;12
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;209
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4.39
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;4.13
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;16
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;24
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;17
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14.24
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;11.40
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;14.07
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;26.24
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;23.88
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;26.10
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;35
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;20
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;34
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;28.47
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;17.64
19.1 COMPUTER AND RELATED ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;27.83
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;67
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;5
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;72
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;61
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;5
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;66
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;8.99
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;9.25
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;9.01
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;70
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;75
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;57
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;63
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;9.31
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;11.24
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;9.43
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;98
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;14
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;112
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;92
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;14
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;106
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;6
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;97
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;50
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;147
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;85
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;50
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;135
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;12
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;50
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;9
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;59
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;105
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;15
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;120
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;71
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;11
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;83
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;156
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;8
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;164
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;176
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;11
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;187
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;147
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;10
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;157
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;4.61
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;4.35
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;18
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;34
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;19
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;14.83
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;16.15
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;14.90
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;25.32
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;33.85
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;25.80
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;39
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;28
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;38
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;27.35
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;25.00
19.1.1 COMPUTER PROGRAMMES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;27.22
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;39
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;8
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;47
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;39
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;8
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;47
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;7.41
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;30.19
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;8.46
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;10
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;40
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;10
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;40
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;5.66
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;38.63
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;7.18
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;147
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;177
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;147
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;30
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;177
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;116
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;224
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;340
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;116
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;224
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;340
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;4
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;7
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;27
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;29
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;19
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;21
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;61
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;64
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;46
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;48
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;49
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;2
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;52
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.79
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;3.55
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;12
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;11
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;12.66
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;11.86
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;28.73
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;26.92
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;24
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;0
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;23
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;31.47
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.1.2 OTHER COMPUTING ACTIVITIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;29.48
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;47
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;2
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;49
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;44
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;2
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;46
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;3
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;31.35
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;50.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;31.83
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;45
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;1
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;46
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;42
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;1
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;43
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;0
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;3
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;29.62
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;25.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;29.50
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;262
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;61
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;323
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;235
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;61
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;296
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;27
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;27
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;411
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;270
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;681
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;382
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;270
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;652
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;29
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;0
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;29
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;19
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;1
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;20
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;22
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;1
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;23
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;26
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;0
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;26
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;42
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;2
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;44
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;43
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;2
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;45
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;46
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;1
19.2 R+D SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;47
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11.35
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;11.09
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;11
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;50
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;12
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;21.33
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;20.84
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;41.54
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;40.59
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;32
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;0
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;31
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;34.39
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;0.00
19.2 R+D SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;33.60
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;58
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;17
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;75
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;55
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;13
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;68
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;3
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;4
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;7
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;0.44
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;2.93
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;0.54
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;92
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;17
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;109
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;51
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;10
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;61
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;41
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;7
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;48
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;0.70
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;2.96
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;0.79
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;107
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;45
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;152
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;99
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;41
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;140
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;4
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;12
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;159
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;237
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;396
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;82
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;229
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;311
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;77
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;86
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;198
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;13
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;211
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;117
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;21
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;138
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;72
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;13
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;85
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;296
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;18
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;315
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;384
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;24
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;408
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;361
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;39
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;400
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;2.38
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;4.91
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;2.57
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;5
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;5
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.34
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;15.78
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;4.29
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8.58
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;19.46
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;9.41
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;8
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;19
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;9
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;20.01
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;18.78
19.3 OTHER SERVICES TO COMPANIES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;19.92
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;137
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;16
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A): Companies that have applied for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;153
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;27
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;250 or more employees;4
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A1): Innovative;Total 2000;31
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;110
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;250 or more employees;12
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A2) Non innovative;Total 2000;122
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Less than 250 employees;1.57
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;250 or more employees;7.84
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(A3) % of companies with patent application;Total 2000;1.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;152
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;18
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B): Companies with patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;170
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Less than 250 employees;49
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;250 or more employees;4
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B1): Innovative;Total 2000;53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Less than 250 employees;103
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;250 or more employees;14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B2): Non innovative;Total 2000;116
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Less than 250 employees;1.74
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;250 or more employees;9.06
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(B3): % of companies with patents in force;Total 2000;1.91
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Less than 250 employees;229
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;250 or more employees;26
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C): Number of applications for patents in 1998-2000;Total 2000;255
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;250 or more employees;7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C1): From innovative companies;Total 2000;26
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;210
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;250 or more employees;19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(C2): From non innovative companies;Total 2000;229
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Less than 250 employees;332
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;250 or more employees;58
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D): Number of patents in force at the end of 2000;Total 2000;391
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;88
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;250 or more employees;5
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D1) From innovative companies;Total 2000;93
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Less than 250 employees;245
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;250 or more employees;53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(D2) From non-innovative companies;Total 2000;297
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Less than 250 employees;160
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;250 or more employees;6
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their innventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Register of models or designs;Total 2000;167
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Less than 250 employees;91
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;250 or more employees;11
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Factory brandnames;Total 2000;102
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Less than 250 employees;110
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;250 or more employees;15
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: royalties;Total 2000;125
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Less than 250 employees;54
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;250 or more employees;7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000 by way of: Industrial secret;Total 2000;61
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Less than 250 employees;71
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;250 or more employees;8
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies that protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Complexity in the design;Total 2000;79
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Less than 250 employees;99
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;250 or more employees;14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;Companies which protect their inventions or innovations in 1998-2000: Time spent leading competitors;Total 2000;112
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Less than 250 employees;9.17
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;250 or more employees;5.19
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of register of models or designs of high importance;Total 2000;8.80
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Less than 250 employees;7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;250 or more employees;14
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of factory trademarks of high importance;Total 2000;7
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Less than 250 employees;21.15
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;250 or more employees;25.94
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of royalties of high importance;Total 2000;21.59
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Less than 250 employees;3.83
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;250 or more employees;2.68
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of industrial secret of high importance;Total 2000;3.72
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Less than 250 employees;6
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;250 or more employees;0
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of design complexity of high importance;Total 2000;5
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Less than 250 employees;6.05
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;250 or more employees;9.53
20. PUBLIC, SOCIAL AND COLLECTIVE SERVICES;(%) protect and consider the method of time leading competitors of high importance;Total 2000;6.37